Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39243056›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2024

Neurological monitoring and management for adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients: Extracorporeal Life Support Organization consensus guidelines.

Sung-Min Cho, Jaeho Hwang, Giovanni Chiarini, Marwa Amer, Marta V Antonini, Nicholas Barrett, Jan Belohlavek, Daniel Brodie, Heidi J Dalton, Rodrigo Diaz and 20 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. NIRS monitoring missing brain death in an ECMO patient.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Sung-Min ChoDivisions of Neuroscience Critical Care and Cardiac Surgery Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Phipps 455, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. csungmi1@jhmi.edu.
Jaeho HwangDivisions of Neuroscience Critical Care and Cardiac Surgery Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Phipps 455, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Giovanni ChiariniCardiothoracic Surgery Department, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marwa AmerMedical/Critical Pharmacy Division, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, 11564, Al Mathar Ash Shamali, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Marta V AntoniniBufalini Hospital, AUSL della Romagna, Cesena, Italy.
Nicholas BarrettDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jan Belohlavek2nd Department of Medicine, Cardiology and Angiologiy, General University Hospital and 1st School of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Daniel BrodieDivision of Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Heidi J DaltonDepartments of Surgery and Pediatrics, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, USA.
Rodrigo DiazPrograma de Oxigenación Por Membrana Extracorpórea, Hospital San Juan de Dios Santiago, Santiago, Chile.
Alyaa ElhazmiMedical/Critical Pharmacy Division, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, 11564, Al Mathar Ash Shamali, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Pouya Tahsili-FahadanDivisions of Neuroscience Critical Care and Cardiac Surgery Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Phipps 455, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Jonathon FanningCritical Care Research Group, Adult Intensive Care Services, The Prince Charles Hospital and University of Queensland, Rode Rd, Chermside, QLD, 4032, Australia.
John FraserCritical Care Research Group, Adult Intensive Care Services, The Prince Charles Hospital and University of Queensland, Rode Rd, Chermside, QLD, 4032, Australia.
Aparna HoskoteCardiorespiratory and Critical Care Division, Great Ormond Street Hospital for, Children National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jae-Seung JungDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Christopher LotzDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Graeme MacLarenCardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Giles PeekCongenital Heart Center, Departments of Surgery and Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Angelo PolitoPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Woman, Child, and Adolescent Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jan Pudil2nd Department of Medicine, Cardiology and Angiologiy, General University Hospital and 1st School of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lakshmi RamanDepartment of Pediatrics, Section Critical Care Medicine, Children's Medical Center at Dallas, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Kollengode RamanathanCardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Dinis Dos Reis MirandaDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniel Rob2nd Department of Medicine, Cardiology and Angiologiy, General University Hospital and 1st School of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Leonardo Salazar RojasECMO Department, Fundacion Cardiovascular de Colombia, Floridablanca, Santander, Colombia.
Fabio Silvio TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Glenn WhitmanDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Akram M Zaaqoq *Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Roberto Lorusso *Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

Predicting ECMO NeuroLogICal Injuries using mAchiNe Learning (PELICAN)R01NS133142 · NINDS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lakshmi Raman · 2023 to 2026
$2.1M
CLots and Oxygen in Va-ExtracorpoReal membrane oxygenation (CLOVER) studyK23HL157610 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Sung-Min Cho · 2022 to 2026
$797k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL157610NIH HHS 1K23HL157610NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS133142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritical care of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with acute brain injury (ABI) is notable for a lack of high-quality clinical evidence. Here, we offer guidelines for neurological care (neurological monitoring and management) of adults during and after ECMO support.

methodsThese guidelines are based on clinical practice consensus recommendations and scientific statements. We convened an international multidisciplinary consensus panel including 30 clinician-scientists with expertise in ECMO from all chapters of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). We used a modified Delphi process with three rounds of voting and asked panelists to assess the recommendation levels.

resultsWe identified five key clinical areas needing guidance: (1) neurological monitoring, (2) post-cannulation early physiological targets and ABI, (3) neurological therapy including medical and surgical intervention, (4) neurological prognostication, and (5) neurological follow-up and outcomes. The consensus produced 30 statements and recommendations regarding key clinical areas. We identified several knowledge gaps to shape future research efforts.

conclusionsThe impact of ABI on morbidity and mortality in ECMO patients is significant. Particularly, early detection and timely intervention are crucial for improving outcomes. These consensus recommendations and scientific statements serve to guide the neurological monitoring and prevention of ABI, and management strategy of ECMO-associated ABI.

Indexed as

ConsensusExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationAdultBrain InjuriesDelphi TechniqueHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicAcute brain injuryECMOGuidelinesICU careNeurological careNeurological outcomesNeuromonitoringStroke

Identifiers

PMID39243056
PMCPMC11380208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.