Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39242999›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2024

Gender and Race/Ethnicity dynamics in anesthesiology mentorship: results of a European survey.

Mia Gisselbaek, Becki Marsh, Laura Soriano, Sophie Jackman, Laurence Seidel, Adelin Albert, Idit Matot, Steve Coppens, Samer Narouze, Odmara L Barreto Chang and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05968339 (Survey Evaluating Elements in Choosing Mentors/ Mentees in Anesthesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05968339 unknown statusnot on this map

Survey Evaluating Elements in Choosing Mentors/ Mentees in Anesthesia

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversité Libre de BruxellesRan2023 to 2024Enrolled1,000ConditionsAnesthesiaArmsSurvey
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Beyond misconduct: forging an ethical future in academia.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mia GisselbaekDivision of Anaesthesiology, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive care, and Emergency medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland. Mia.Gisselbaek@gmail.com.
Becki MarshDepartment of Anaesthetics and Critical Care, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, Cornwall, UK.
Laura SorianoDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Sophie JackmanDepartment of Acute Medicine, Peterborough City Hospital, North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, UK.
Laurence SeidelB-STAT, Biostatistics and Research Method Center of ULiège and CHU of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Adelin AlbertDepartment of Public Health sciences, ULiège, Liege, Belgium.
Idit MatotDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Steve CoppensDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Samer NarouzeDivision of Pain Management , University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Odmara L Barreto ChangDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Sarah SaxenaUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMentorship is crucial to career advancement, medical education, and psychosocial support, especially for women and minorities. Although anesthesia mentoring programs have shown promise, there are no survey data regarding mentor-mentee relationship dynamics. This study aimed to explore the dynamics of the anesthesia mentor/mentee relationship.

methodsA open cross-sectional web-based survey was distributed by the European Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care and European Society of Regional Anesthesia to European anesthesiologists. Participation was anonymous and consent was obtained. The study evaluated responses relating to preferences, facilitators, and barriers to mentorship relationships along with sociodemographic information.

resultsIn total, 543 anesthesiologists responded to the survey, and 406 (111 mentees, 49 mentors, 193 both, 53 neither) responded to questions regarding mentorship. 184 anesthesiologists identified as woman and 22 as other genders (non-binary, transgender, gender-fluid, and self-described gender). Moreover, 250 anesthesiologists identified as white. Both mentors and mentees indicated that personal compatibility was the most important factor for successful mentorship. Barriers to mentorship included time consumption and perceived lack of interest from the mentor and mentee. Both mentors and mentees benefited from this relationship. The former reported feeling helpful, and the latter supported the development of clinical skills. The mentors indicated that their participation was important for protecting against burnout/exhaustion and impostor syndrome. Participants reported a preference for mentorship programs organized at the departmental level, offered at the start of the anesthesiology education curricula. Women were more likely to feel a 'lack of interest' in mentoring them as a barrier (OR = 2.49, P = 0.033). Gender was a barrier for mentors of other genders (OR = 23.9, P = 0.0027) and ethnicity (OR = 48.0, P = 0.0023). White mentees found gender (OR = 0.14, P = 0.021) and ethnicity (OR = 0.11, P = 0.048) to be less important barriers to successful mentorship relationship.

conclusionWhen possible, programs should prioritize matching mentors and mentees based on personal compatibility and experience in the mentee's area of interest. Addressing the perceived lack of interest in mentoring is essential for promoting diversity, equality, and inclusion within anesthesiology, as well as and uplifting women and minorities.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05968339, First posted (01/08/2023).

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyMentorsAdultAnesthesiologistsCross-Sectional StudiesEthnicityEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRacial GroupsSex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesAnesthesiaEducationEthnicityGenderMentorship

Identifiers

PMID39242999
PMCPMC11378607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.