Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39242890›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2023

Contextual cueing of visual search reflects the acquisition of an optimal, one-for-all oculomotor scanning strategy.

Werner Seitz, Artyom Zinchenko, Hermann J Müller, Thomas Geyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Visual statistical learning requires attention.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Werner SeitzDepartment Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany. Werner.Seitz@campus.lmu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8483-5109
Artyom ZinchenkoDepartment Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Hermann J MüllerDepartment Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Thomas GeyerDepartment Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) GE 1889/4-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual search improves when a target is encountered repeatedly at a fixed location within a stable distractor arrangement (spatial context), compared to non-repeated contexts. The standard account attributes this contextual-cueing effect to the acquisition of display-specific long-term memories, which, when activated by the current display, cue attention to the target location. Here we present an alternative, procedural-optimization account, according to which contextual facilitation arises from the acquisition of generic oculomotor scanning strategies, optimized with respect to the entire set of displays, with frequently searched displays accruing greater weight in the optimization process. To decide between these alternatives, we examined measures of the similarity, across time-on-task, of the spatio-temporal sequences of fixations through repeated and non-repeated displays. We found scanpath similarity to increase generally with learning, but more for repeated versus non-repeated displays. This pattern contradicts display-specific guidance, but supports one-for-all scanpath optimization.

Identifiers

PMID39242890
PMCPMC11332235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.