Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39242870›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2023

A multi-site German validation of the Interoceptive Accuracy Scale and its relation to psychopathological symptom burden.

Sebastian Brand, Annelie Claudia Meis, Markus Roman Tünte, Jennifer Murphy, Joshua Pepe Woller, Stefanie Maria Jungmann, Michael Witthöft, Stefanie Hoehl, Mathias Weymar, Christiane Hermann and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Interoception in pregnancy: Implications for peripartum depression.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sebastian Brand *Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Experimental Psychopathology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany. sebbrand@uni-mainz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1195-6326
Annelie Claudia Meis *Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8655-5706
Markus Roman Tünte *Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jennifer MurphyDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, London, UK.
Joshua Pepe WollerDepartment of Biological Psychology and Affective Science, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Stefanie Maria JungmannDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Experimental Psychopathology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Michael WitthöftDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Experimental Psychopathology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4928-4222
Stefanie HoehlDepartment of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0472-0374
Mathias WeymarDepartment of Biological Psychology and Affective Science, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3968-9656
Christiane HermannDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.
Carlos Ventura-Bort *Department of Biological Psychology and Affective Science, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 33486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Altered interoception is thought to be implicated in the development of psychopathology. Recent proposals highlight the need to differentiate between dimensions of interoception to better understand its relation to mental health. Here, we validated a German version of the Interoceptive Accuracy Scale (IAS) and investigated the relationship between IAS scores and clinical outcomes, across seven samples from four research centers (N = 3462). The German IAS version was best explained by a one-factor structure that showed acceptable psychometric properties. We replicated previous findings showing a negative association between IAS scores and measures of alexithymia. IAS scores were negatively related to measures of clinical symptomatology (e.g., anxiety, depressive, and somatoform symptoms) and neurotic traits. These findings suggest that the German IAS is a reliable and valid instrument for subjective interoceptive accuracy. Results emphasize the importance of distinguishing between dimensions of interoception to understand its potential modulatory and protective role in psychopathology.

Identifiers

PMID39242870
PMCPMC11332230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.