Articlenpj biodiversity2024
National commitments to Aichi Targets and their implications for monitoring the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.
Article in npj biodiversity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Ambition to Action: Barriers and Enablers for the Inclusion of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities in the Kunming-Montreal Biodiversity Framework and the Role of Non-State Bridge Organizations.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Assessing coverage of the monitoring framework of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and opportunities to fill gaps.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- Biodiversity science and biosurveillance are fellow travelers.Bioscience · 2025Article
- Ambitions in national plans do not yet match bold international protection and restoration commitments.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- The estimated cost of preventing extinction and progressing recovery for Australia's priority threatened species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- How can biodiversity strategy and action plans incorporate genetic diversity and align with global commitments?Bioscience · 2025Article
- Metrics for biodiversity and health policy integration.PLOS global public health · 2025Review
- Progress in developing and operationalizing the Monitoring Framework of the Global Biodiversity Framework.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024Review
- Climate-Smart Siting for renewable energy expansion.iScience · 2024Review
- Action on ambition.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Convention on Biological Biodiversity (CBD) exists as a major multilateral environmental agreement to safeguard biodiversity and "live in harmony with nature". To deliver it, strategies and frameworks are set out in regular agreements that are then implemented at the national scale. However, we are not on track to achieve overall goals, and frameworks so far have not been successful. This could be due to unambitious targets, low follow-through on commitments, or desired outcomes for nature not being achieved when action is taken. Here, we focus on national planning and reporting documents from a set of 30% of Parties to the CBD. We found that nearly half of the commitments mentioned in national planning documents did not appear in the Sixth National Reports and that further losses emerged due to measures reported as incomplete or ineffective. There were differences between commitments to each of the Aichi Targets, with more losses in high-profile and "institutionally challenging" Targets. Commitments from Parties in different Human Development Index categories had different outcomes among Targets, and Parties self-identifying as "megadiverse countries" had overall higher rates of reported success. Our results are important for informing the monitoring of commitment implementation in the Kunming-Montreal "global biodiversity package".
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.