Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39242810›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2024

MyThisYourThat for interpretable identification of systematic bias in federated learning for biomedical images.

Klavdiia Naumova, Arnout Devos, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Martin Jaggi, Mary-Anne Hartley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Klavdiia NaumovaLaboratory for Intelligent Global Health and Humanitarian Response Technologies (LiGHT), Machine Learning and Optimization Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0951-9576
Arnout DevosETH AI Center, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zurich), Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9425-1163
Sai Praneeth KarimireddyBerkeley AI Research Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Martin JaggiMachine Learning and Optimization Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mary-Anne HartleyLaboratory for Intelligent Global Health and Humanitarian Response Technologies (LiGHT), Machine Learning and Optimization Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland. mary-anne.hartley@yale.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distributed collaborative learning is a promising approach for building predictive models for privacy-sensitive biomedical images. Here, several data owners (clients) train a joint model without sharing their original data. However, concealed systematic biases can compromise model performance and fairness. This study presents MyThisYourThat (MyTH) approach, which adapts an interpretable prototypical part learning network to a distributed setting, enabling each client to visualize feature differences learned by others on their own image: comparing one client's 'This' with others' 'That'. Our setting demonstrates four clients collaboratively training two diagnostic classifiers on a benchmark X-ray dataset. Without data bias, the global model reaches 74.14% balanced accuracy for cardiomegaly and 74.08% for pleural effusion. We show that with systematic visual bias in one client, the performance of global models drops to near-random. We demonstrate how differences between local and global prototypes reveal biases and allow their visualization on each client's data without compromising privacy.

Identifiers

PMID39242810
PMCPMC11379706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.