ArticleScientific reports2024
Uptake of substances into living mammalian cells by microwave induced perturbation of the plasma membrane.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microwave-induced modulation of intracellular distribution of peptides based on mitochondrial targeting sequences.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Delivering foreign molecules and genetic material into cells is a crucial process in life sciences and biotechnology, resulting in great interest in effective cell transfection methods. Importantly, physical transfection methods allow delivery of molecules of different chemical composition and are, thus, very flexible. Here, we investigated the influence of microwave radiation on the transfection and survival of mammalian cells. We made use of an optimized microwave-poration device and analyzed its performance (frequency and electric field strength) in comparison with simulations. We, then, tested the effect of microwave irradiation on cells and found that 18 GHz had the least impact on cell survival, viability, cell division and genotoxicity while 10 GHz drastically impacted cell physiology. Using live-cell fluorescence microscopy and image analysis, we tested the uptake of small chemical substances, which was most efficient at 18 GHz and correlated with electric field strength and frequency. Finally, we were able to obtain cellular uptake of molecules of very different chemical composition and sizes up to whole immunoglobulin antibodies. In conclusion, microwave-induced poration enables the uptake of widely different substances directly into mammalian cells growing as adherent cultures and with low physiological impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.