Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39242767›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2023

Commitment to honesty oaths decreases dishonesty, but commitment to another individual does not affect dishonesty.

Janis H Zickfeld, Karolina Aleksandra Ścigała, Alexa Weiss, John Michael, Panagiotis Mitkidis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janis H ZickfeldDepartment of Management, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. jhzickfeld@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7660-2719
Karolina Aleksandra ŚcigałaDepartment of Psychology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4689-0697
Alexa WeissDepartment of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5718-5961
John MichaelDepartment of Philosophy, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4516-196X
Panagiotis MitkidisDepartment of Management, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9495-7369

Funding

Aarhus Universitets Forskningsfond (Aarhus University Research Foundation) AUFF-E-2019-9-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social commitment influences our behavior in various ways. Recent studies suggest that social commitment to other individuals or groups can increase dishonest behavior while feeling commitment to moral norms might decrease it. Here we show in a pre-registered series of 7 studies investigating the influence of social commitment on dishonest behavior by sampling 7566 participants across three countries (the UK, the US, and Mexico) that commitment to moral norms via honesty oaths might decrease dishonesty (OR = 0.79 [0.72, 0.88]). To the contrary, we found no credible evidence that social commitment to other individuals increases dishonesty (OR = 1.08 [0.97, 1.20]). Finally, we observed that commitment to moral norms was less effective if participants were committed to another individual at the same time (OR = 0.95 [0.86, 1.06]). Our findings point at the potential effectiveness of honesty oaths, while the observed effect sizes were small compared to previous studies.

Identifiers

PMID39242767
PMCPMC11332245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.