ArticleScientific reports2024
Multiparametric influence of 3D-printed organo-mineral scaffolds on bone regeneration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Therapeutic effect of concentrated growth factors combined with self-curing calcium phosphate cement on periodontal intrabony defects: Clinical and radiographic evaluation].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025Trial
- Co-incorporation of Phosphorus and zinc into wollastonite ceramic granules synergically facilitating thin-walled structures regeneration.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of synthetic bone substitutes that equal or exceed the efficacy of autologous graft remains challenging. In this study, a rat calvarial defect model was used as a reference to investigate the influence of composition and architecture of 3D-printed cement, with or without bioactives, on tissue regeneration. Printable cement pastes were formulated by combining hyaluronic acid and cement precursors. Cementitious scaffolds were printed with 3 different patterns. After 7 weeks of implantation with or without bone marrow, multiparametric qualitative and quantitative assessments were performed using µCT, SEM, and histology. None of the set-up strategies was as efficient as autologous cancellous bone graft to repair calvarial defects. Nonetheless, the presence of scaffold improved the skull vault closure, particularly when the scaffold was soaked in total bone marrow before implantation. No significant effect of scaffold macro-architecture was observed on tissue mineralization. Magnesium phosphate-based scaffolds (MgP) seemed to induce higher bone formation than their calcium-phosphate-based counterparts. They also displayed a quicker biodegradation and sparse remaining material was found after 7 weeks of implantation. Although further improvements are required to reach clinical settings, this study demonstrated the potential of organo-mineral cements for bone regeneration and highlighted the peculiar properties of MgP-based cements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.