Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39242744›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Practical feature filter strategy to machine learning for small datasets in chemistry.

Yang Hu, Roland Sandt, Robert Spatschek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yang HuInstitute of Energy Materials and Devices IMD-1, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428, Jülich, Germany. y.hu@fz-juelich.de.
Roland SandtInstitute of Energy Materials and Devices IMD-1, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428, Jülich, Germany.
Robert SpatschekInstitute of Energy Materials and Devices IMD-1, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428, Jülich, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 03SF0622BDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 491111487
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many potential use cases for machine learning in chemistry and materials science suffer from small dataset sizes, which demands special care for the model design in order to deliver reliable predictions. Hence, feature selection as the key determinant for dataset design is essential here. We propose a practical and efficient feature filter strategy to determine the best input feature candidates. We illustrate this strategy for the prediction of adsorption energies based on a public dataset and sublimation enthalpies using an in-house training dataset. The input of adsorption energies reduces the feature space from 12 dimensions to two and still delivers accurate results. For the sublimation enthalpies, three input configurations are filtered from 14 possible configurations with different dimensions for further productive predictions as being most relevant by using our feature filter strategy. The best extreme gradient boosting regression model possesses a good performance and is evaluated from statistical and theoretical perspectives, reaching a level of accuracy comparable to density functional theory computations and allowing for physical interpretations of the predictions. Overall, the results indicate that the feature filter strategy can help interdisciplinary scientists without rich professional AI knowledge and limited computational resources to establish a reliable small training dataset first, which may make the final machine learning model training easier and more accurate, avoiding time-consuming hyperparameter explorations and improper feature selection.

Identifiers

PMID39242744
PMCPMC11379859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.