ArticleCommunications psychology2023
Saliency models perform best for women's and young adults' fixations.
Article in Communications psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protracted development of gaze behaviour.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
- Gaze data of 4243 participants shows link between leftward and superior attention biases and age.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Saliency models seek to predict fixation locations in (human) gaze behaviour. These are typically created to generalize across a wide range of visual scenes but validated using only a few participants. Generalizations across individuals are generally implied. We tested this implied generalization across people, not images, with gaze data of 1600 participants. Using a single, feature-rich image, we found shortcomings in the prediction of fixations across this diverse sample. Models performed optimally for women and participants aged 18-29. Furthermore, model predictions differed in performance from earlier to later fixations. Our findings show that gaze behavior towards low-level visual input varies across participants and reflects dynamic underlying processes. We conclude that modeling and understanding gaze behavior will require an approach which incorporates differences in gaze behavior across participants and fixations; validates generalizability; and has a critical eye to potential biases in training- and testing data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.