Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39242726›Full record

Articlenpj biodiversity2024

Detecting kelp-forest associated metazoan biodiversity with eDNA metabarcoding.

Emma I Rossouw, Jannes Landschoff, Andrew Ndhlovu, Götz Neef, Masaki Miya, Kira-Lee Courtaillac, Rouane Brokensha, Sophie von der Heyden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj biodiversity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emma I RossouwDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.
Jannes LandschoffDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.
Andrew NdhlovuDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.
Götz NeefDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.
Masaki MiyaNatural History Museum and Institute, Chiba, 955-2 Aoba-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8682, Japan.
Kira-Lee CourtaillacDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.
Rouane BrokenshaSea Change Project, Sea Change Trust, 6 Buxton Avenue, Oranjezicht, 8001, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sophie von der HeydenDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa. svdh@sun.ac.za.

Funding

National Research Foundation 105842Save Our Seas Foundation Keystone Grant 542 (1001 Seaforest Species)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a promising tool for monitoring marine biodiversity, but remains underutilised in Africa. In this study, we evaluated the ability of aquatic eDNA metabarcoding as a tool for detecting biodiversity associated with a South African kelp forest, an ecosystem that harbours high diversity of species, many of which are endemic, but are also sensitive to changing environmental conditions and anthropogenic pressures. Using fine-scale spatial (1 m and 8 m) and temporal (every four hours for 24 h) sampling of aquatic environmental DNA and targeting two gene regions (mtDNA COI and 12S rRNA), metabarcoding detected 880 OTUs representing 75 families in the broader metazoan community with 44 OTUs representing 24 fish families. We show extensive variability in the eDNA signal across space and time and did not recover significant spatio-temporal structure in OTU richness and community assemblages. Metabarcoding detected a broad range of taxonomic groups, including arthropods, ascidians, cnidarians, echinoderms, ctenophores, molluscs, polychaetes, ichthyofauna and sponges, as well as Placozoa, previously not reported from South Africa. Fewer than 3% of OTUs could be identified to species level using available databases (COI = 19 OTUs, 12S = 11 OTUs). Our study emphasizes that kelp-forest associated biodiversity in South Africa is understudied, but that with careful consideration for sampling design in combination with increased barcoding efforts and the construction of regional databases, eDNA metabarcoding will become a powerful biomonitoring tool of kelp-forest associated biodiversity.

Identifiers

PMID39242726
PMCPMC11332002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.