ArticleCommunications psychology2024
Thinking clearly about misinformation.
Article in Communications psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The gateway (mis)belief model: How misinformation impacts perceptions of scientific consensus and attitudes towards climate change.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026Article
- Trust in institutions and misinformation susceptibility both independently explain vaccine skepticism.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Modeling the amplification of epidemic spread by individuals exposed to misinformation on social media.Npj complexity · 2025Article
- Did he or didn't he? Mixed evidence for the continued influence of retracted misinformation on person impressions.PloS one · 2025Article
- Don't believe them! Reducing misinformation influence through source discreditation.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2024Article
- Nudge-based misinformation interventions are effective in information environments with low misinformation prevalence.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A focus shift in the evaluation of misinformation interventions.Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.