Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39242690›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Leveraging AI and patient metadata to develop a novel risk score for skin cancer detection.

Shafiqul Islam, Gordon C Wishart, Joseph Walls, Per Hall, Alba G Seco de Herrera, John Q Gan, Haider Raza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shafiqul IslamSchool of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Essex, Colchester, UK. md.shafiqul.islam@essex.ac.uk.
Gordon C WishartCheck4Cancer Ltd., Cambridge, UK.
Joseph WallsCheck4Cancer Ltd., Cambridge, UK.
Per HallCheck4Cancer Ltd., Cambridge, UK.
Alba G Seco de HerreraSchool of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
John Q GanSchool of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Haider RazaSchool of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Essex, Colchester, UK. h.raza@essex.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanoma of the skin is the 17th most common cancer worldwide. Early detection of suspicious skin lesions (melanoma) can increase 5-year survival rates by 20%. The 7-point checklist (7PCL) has been extensively used to suggest urgent referrals for patients with a possible melanoma. However, the 7PCL method only considers seven meta-features to calculate a risk score and is only relevant for patients with suspected melanoma. There are limited studies on the extensive use of patient metadata for the detection of all skin cancer subtypes. This study investigates artificial intelligence (AI) models that utilise patient metadata consisting of 23 attributes for suspicious skin lesion detection. We have identified a new set of most important risk factors, namely "C4C risk factors", which is not just for melanoma, but for all types of skin cancer. The performance of the C4C risk factors for suspicious skin lesion detection is compared to that of the 7PCL and the Williams risk factors that predict the lifetime risk of melanoma. Our proposed AI framework ensembles five machine learning models and identifies seven new skin cancer risk factors: lesion pink, lesion size, lesion colour, lesion inflamed, lesion shape, lesion age, and natural hair colour, which achieved a sensitivity of

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMetadataMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID39242690
PMCPMC11379912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.