ArticleScientific reports2024
Input specificity of NMDA-dependent GABAergic plasticity in the hippocampus.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular and neural circuit mechanisms of parvalbumin (PV) neurons in depression: Insights and advances.iScience · 2026Review
- Neuroligin-2-Dependent Adhesion Defines a Molecular Checkpoint for Inhibitory Synaptic Plasticity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience: Transformative Synergies in Brain Research and Clinical Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensory experiences and learning induce long-lasting changes in both excitatory and inhibitory synapses, thereby providing a crucial substrate for memory. However, the co-tuning of excitatory long-term potentiation (eLTP) or depression (eLTD) with the simultaneous changes at inhibitory synapses (iLTP/iLTD) remains unclear. Herein, we investigated the co-expression of NMDA-induced synaptic plasticity at excitatory and inhibitory synapses in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells (PCs) using a combination of electrophysiological, optogenetic, and pharmacological approaches. We found that inhibitory inputs from somatostatin (SST) and parvalbumin (PV)-positive interneurons onto CA1 PCs display input-specific long-term plastic changes following transient NMDA receptor activation. Notably, synapses from SST-positive interneurons consistently exhibited iLTP, irrespective of the direction of excitatory plasticity, whereas synapses from PV-positive interneurons predominantly showed iLTP concurrent with eLTP, rather than eLTD. As neuroplasticity is known to depend on the extracellular matrix, we tested the impact of metalloproteinases (MMP) inhibition. MMP3 blockade interfered with GABAergic plasticity for all inhibitory inputs, whereas MMP9 inhibition selectively blocked eLTP and iLTP in SST-CA1PC synapses co-occurring with eLTP but not eLTD. These findings demonstrate the dissociation of excitatory and inhibitory plasticity co-expression. We propose that these mechanisms of plasticity co-expression may be involved in maintaining excitation-inhibition balance and modulating neuronal integration modes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.