Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39242672›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Input specificity of NMDA-dependent GABAergic plasticity in the hippocampus.

Grzegorz Wiera, Jadwiga Jabłońska, Anna Maria Lech, Jerzy W Mozrzymas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Neuroligin-2-Dependent Adhesion Defines a Molecular Checkpoint for Inhibitory Synaptic Plasticity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Grzegorz WieraDepartment of Biophysics and Neuroscience, Wroclaw Medical University, 3a Chalubinskiego Str., 50-368, Wroclaw, Poland. grzegorz.wiera@umw.edu.pl.
Jadwiga JabłońskaDepartment of Biophysics and Neuroscience, Wroclaw Medical University, 3a Chalubinskiego Str., 50-368, Wroclaw, Poland.
Anna Maria LechDepartment of Biophysics and Neuroscience, Wroclaw Medical University, 3a Chalubinskiego Str., 50-368, Wroclaw, Poland.
Jerzy W MozrzymasDepartment of Biophysics and Neuroscience, Wroclaw Medical University, 3a Chalubinskiego Str., 50-368, Wroclaw, Poland. jerzy.mozrzymas@umw.edu.pl.

Funding

National Science Centre OPUS 2021/43/B/NZ4/01675National Science Centre SONATA 2017/26/D/NZ4/00450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory experiences and learning induce long-lasting changes in both excitatory and inhibitory synapses, thereby providing a crucial substrate for memory. However, the co-tuning of excitatory long-term potentiation (eLTP) or depression (eLTD) with the simultaneous changes at inhibitory synapses (iLTP/iLTD) remains unclear. Herein, we investigated the co-expression of NMDA-induced synaptic plasticity at excitatory and inhibitory synapses in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells (PCs) using a combination of electrophysiological, optogenetic, and pharmacological approaches. We found that inhibitory inputs from somatostatin (SST) and parvalbumin (PV)-positive interneurons onto CA1 PCs display input-specific long-term plastic changes following transient NMDA receptor activation. Notably, synapses from SST-positive interneurons consistently exhibited iLTP, irrespective of the direction of excitatory plasticity, whereas synapses from PV-positive interneurons predominantly showed iLTP concurrent with eLTP, rather than eLTD. As neuroplasticity is known to depend on the extracellular matrix, we tested the impact of metalloproteinases (MMP) inhibition. MMP3 blockade interfered with GABAergic plasticity for all inhibitory inputs, whereas MMP9 inhibition selectively blocked eLTP and iLTP in SST-CA1PC synapses co-occurring with eLTP but not eLTD. These findings demonstrate the dissociation of excitatory and inhibitory plasticity co-expression. We propose that these mechanisms of plasticity co-expression may be involved in maintaining excitation-inhibition balance and modulating neuronal integration modes.

Indexed as

InterneuronsNeuronal PlasticityPyramidal CellsAnimalsCA1 Region, HippocampalGABAergic NeuronsHippocampusLong-Term PotentiationMaleMatrix Metalloproteinase 3Matrix Metalloproteinase 9MiceN-MethylaspartateParvalbuminsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSomatostatinMatrix Metalloproteinase 3Matrix Metalloproteinase 9N-MethylaspartateParvalbuminsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSomatostatinExcitation-inhibition balanceGABAHeterosynapticiLTPInhibitory plasticityNMDA

Identifiers

PMID39242672
PMCPMC11379801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.