Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39242663›Full record

Reviewnpj biodiversity2023

Past, present, and future of the Living Planet Index.

Sophie E H Ledger, Jonathan Loh, Rosamunde Almond, Monika Böhm, Christopher F Clements, Jessica Currie, Stefanie Deinet, Thomas Galewski, Monique Grooten, Martin Jenkins and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in npj biodiversity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Providing regular and frequent maps of losses and gains of farmland birds based on European monitoring data.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The utility of the Living Planet Index as a policy tool and for measuring nature recovery.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Bending the curve of biodiversity loss requires a 'satnav' for nature.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. LIFE: A metric for mapping the impact of land-cover change on global extinctions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Bioinspired robots can foster nature conservation.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sophie E H LedgerInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London (ZSL), London, UK. sophie.ledger@ioz.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0367-3273
Jonathan LohSchool of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Rosamunde AlmondWWF Netherlands - World Wide Fund for Nature, Zeist, Netherlands.
Monika BöhmGlobal Center for Species Survival, Indianapolis Zoo, Indianapolis, USA.
Christopher F ClementsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Jessica CurrieWWF Canada - World Wildlife Fund Canada, Toronto, Canada.
Stefanie DeinetInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London (ZSL), London, UK.
Thomas GalewskiInstitut de recherche pour la conservation des zones humides méditerranéennes, Tour du Valat, Arles, France.
Monique GrootenWWF Netherlands - World Wide Fund for Nature, Zeist, Netherlands.
Martin JenkinsIndependent researcher, Cambridge, UK.
Valentina MarconiInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London (ZSL), London, UK.
Brett PainterEnvironment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), Government of Canada, Gatineau, Canada.
Kate Scott-GattyInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London (ZSL), London, UK.
Lucy YoungWWF UK - World Wide Fund for Nature, Woking, UK.
Michael HoffmannConservation and Policy, Zoological Society of London (ZSL), London, UK.
Robin FreemanInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London (ZSL), London, UK.
Louise McRaeInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London (ZSL), London, UK. louise.mcrae@ioz.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1076-0874

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As we enter the next phase of international policy commitments to halt biodiversity loss (e.g., Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), biodiversity indicators will play an important role in forming the robust basis upon which targeted, and time sensitive conservation actions are developed. Population trend indicators are one of the most powerful tools in biodiversity monitoring due to their responsiveness to changes over short timescales and their ability to aggregate species trends from global down to sub-national or even local scale. We consider how the project behind one of the foremost population level indicators - the Living Planet Index - has evolved over the last 25 years, its value to the field of biodiversity monitoring, and how its components have portrayed a compelling account of the changing status of global biodiversity through its application at policy, research and practice levels. We explore ways the project can develop to enhance our understanding of the state of biodiversity and share lessons learned to inform indicator development and mobilise action.

Identifiers

PMID39242663
PMCPMC11332142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.