Trial reportScientific reports2024
A randomized placebo controlled trial demonstrates the effect of dl-methylephedrine on brain functions is weaker than that of pseudoephedrine.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Annual Banned-Substance Review 17th Edition-Analytical Approaches in Human Sports Drug Testing 2023/2024.Drug testing and analysis · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intellectual drug doping in athletics by using stimulants that affect central nervous system functions has been diversified. Stimulants are regulated by the World Anti-Doping Agency according to their levels of urinary concentration. Positron emission tomography could evaluate how stimulants affect central nervous system functions. We aimed to evaluate the effect of stimulants on brain function by examining the difference in brain dopamine transporter occupancy by PET after administration of dl-methylephedrine or pseudoephedrine at the clinical maximum daily dose. Four PET scans without and with drug administration (placebo, dl-methylephedrine 150 mg and pseudoephedrine 240 mg) were performed. The concentrations of dl-methylephedrine and pseudoephedrine in plasma and urine were measured. DAT occupancies in the striatum with placebo, dl-methylephedrine and pseudoephedrine were calculated by PET images. The urinary concentration of dl-methylephedrine (12.7 µg/mL) exceeded the prohibited concentration (10 µg/mL), but the DAT occupancy with dl-methylephedrine (6.1%) did not differ (p = 0.92) from that with placebo (6.2%). By contrast, although the urinary concentration of pseudoephedrine (144.8 µg/mL) was below the prohibited concentration (150 μg/mL), DAT occupancy with pseudoephedrine was 18.4%, which was higher than that with placebo (p = 0.009). At the maximum clinical dose, dl-methylephedrine was shown to have weaker effects on brain function than pseudoephedrine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.