ArticleBMC urology2024
The role of early use of Carbapenems perioperatively for urolithiasis with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli.
Article in BMC urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUrolithiasis combined with ESBL-producing E. coli is often difficult to control and leads to higher postoperative infection-related complications. This study was aim to explore the efficacy and necessity for early use of carbapenem antibiotics perioperatively in urolithiasis patients with urinary tract infections caused by ESBL-producing E. coli.
methodsThe study included a total of 626 patients who were separated into two groups: Group I (the ESBL-producing E. coli group) and Group II (the non-ESBL-producing E. coli group). Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed and the two groups induced postoperative infection-related events were recorded. the efficacy of perioperative antibiotics was evaluated.
resultsAll strains of E. coli in our research were sensitive to Carbapenems antibiotics. In addition to Carbapenems, the resistance rates of ESBL-producing E. coli to 6 other commonly used antibiotics were higher than those of non-ESBL-producing strains. Based on the preoperative antibiotic susceptibility test for the ESBL-producing E. coli group and the qSOFA score, the Carbapenems were more effective than the β-lactamase inhibitors (p = 0.08), while for the non-ESBL-producing E. coli group, there was no difference in the treatment effects between Carbapenems, β-lactamase inhibitors, Ceftazidime and Quinolones (p = 0.975).
conclusionsCarbapenem antibiotics significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative infection-related events compared with other types of antibiotics for ESBL-producing E. coli infections in patient with urolithiasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.