Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39242497›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Thromboprophylaxis in oesophageal cancer patients-a study protocol for a randomised, controlled trial (TOP-RCT).

Tua Gyldenholm, Nina Madsen, Niels Katballe, Daniel Willy Kjær, Thomas Decker Christensen, Anne-Mette Hvas

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05067153 (Thromboprophylaxis in Oesophageal Cancer Patients - A Randomized, Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05067153 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

Thromboprophylaxis in Oesophageal Cancer Patients - A Randomized, Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2021 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsEsophageal Neoplasms, Thrombosis, ThromboembolismArmsFragmin 5000 UNT in 0.2 ML Prefilled Syringe
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Patients Undergoing Oesophageal Cancer Surgery Do Not Have Impaired Haemostasis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tua GyldenholmDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. tuagyl@clin.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3040-9486
Nina MadsenDepartment of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Niels KatballeDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Daniel Willy KjærDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Thomas Decker ChristensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anne-Mette HvasFaculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of the study is to examine if prolonged thromboprophylaxis decreases the risk of thrombosis after intended curative surgery for oesophageal cancer. Study results are expected to inform a guideline for thromboprophylaxis after oesophageal cancer surgery. The perspective is to reduce morbidity and mortality in this critically ill patient group. Thrombosis is the second-most common cause of cancer death after the cancer itself. The risk of thrombosis depends on the cancer type, and upper gastrointestinal cancers are considered high risk. This risk is further increased when patients undergo surgery. However, only few studies have investigated the peri- and postoperative coagulation profile in oesophageal cancer patients. Due to this lack of knowledge, prophylaxis is currently restricted to 5000 IU (international units) low-molecular weight heparin daily from surgery until discharge from hospital (approximately 10 days), whereas patients with gastric cancer receive 30 days of treatment. The present study examines whether a 30-day treatment is superior and safe, compared with the current standard treatment.

methodsThe study is a randomised controlled trial. Inclusion is ongoing, and we aim to include 100 patients. Blood samples are drawn before and after surgery, and the coagulation is extensively examined. The primary endpoint is the difference in plasma levels of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2) 30 days after surgery between the intervention and the standard group. Furthermore, patients are examined with ultrasound to screen for asymptomatic venous thrombotic events (VTE). Secondary endpoints are incidence of bleeding, symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE and mortality 30 days 1 one year after surgery. DISCUSSION: The study will provide valuable information on the perioperative coagulation profile and VTE risk of oesophageal cancer patients. The study seeks to aid in optimising the postoperative thromboprophylaxis, and the perspective is to reduce morbidity and mortality in this at-risk patient population. TRIALS REGISTRATION: The trial was prospectively registered at the EU Clinical Trials Register with ID 2021-001335-24 on 30 June 2021 and at ClinicalTrials.gov with study identifier NCT05067153.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsEsophageal NeoplasmsProthrombinRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBlood CoagulationDrug Administration ScheduleEsophagectomyHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansPeptide FragmentsRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVenous ThromboembolismAnticoagulantsHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightPeptide FragmentsProthrombinprothrombin fragment 1.2Oesophageal cancerProthrombin fragment 1 + 2SurgeryVenous thromboembolic events

Identifiers

PMID39242497
PMCPMC11378618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.