ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
Global registration of kidneys in 3D ultrasound and CT images.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAutomatic registration between abdominal ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) images is needed to enhance interventional guidance of renal procedures, but it remains an open research challenge. We propose a novel method that doesn't require an initial registration estimate (a global method) and also handles registration ambiguity caused by the organ's natural symmetry. Combined with a registration refinement algorithm, this method achieves robust and accurate kidney registration while avoiding manual initialization.
methodsWe propose solving global registration in a three-step approach: (1) Automatic anatomical landmark localization, where 2 deep neural networks (DNNs) localize a set of landmarks in each modality. (2) Registration hypothesis generation, where potential registrations are computed from the landmarks with a deterministic variant of RANSAC. Due to the Kidney's strong bilateral symmetry, there are usually 2 compatible solutions. Finally, in Step (3), the correct solution is determined automatically, using a DNN classifier that resolves the geometric ambiguity. The registration may then be iteratively improved with a registration refinement method. Results are presented with state-of-the-art surface-based refinement-Bayesian coherent point drift (BCPD).
resultsThis automatic global registration approach gives better results than various competitive state-of-the-art methods, which, additionally, require organ segmentation. The results obtained on 59 pairs of 3D US/CT kidney images show that the proposed method, combined with BCPD refinement, achieves a target registration error (TRE) of an internal kidney landmark (the renal pelvis) of 5.78 mm and an average nearest neighbor surface distance (nndist) of 2.42 mm.
conclusionThis work presents the first approach for automatic kidney registration in US and CT images, which doesn't require an initial manual registration estimate to be known a priori. The results show a fully automatic registration approach with performances comparable to manual methods is feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39242470What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.