Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39242451›Full record

Observational studyJournal of community health2025

Enhancing CRC Screening in a Predominantly Hispanic Community: Effectiveness of 1-Day vs. 3-Day Stool-Based Testing Kits.

Jonathan D Wing, Pracheta Matharasi, Alok Dwivedi, Jennifer Molokwu

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of community health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan D WingPaul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA.
Pracheta MatharasiPaul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA.
Alok DwivediPaul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA.
Jennifer MolokwuPaul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA. jennifer.molokwu@ttuhsc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7846-8189

Funding

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas PP210005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among U.S. Hispanics, with screening proven to decrease both incidence and mortality. Despite rising CRC screening rates in the U.S., Hispanic participation remains disproportionately low. Stool-based tests, particularly popular for reaching underserved populations, may enhance screening adherence. This study evaluates the performance of a 1-day versus a 3-day stool-based testing kit in improving screening completion rates and reducing the need for reminder calls in a Hispanic community along the U.S.-Mexico border. In our quasi-experimental observational study, participants aged 45-75 years who were uninsured or underinsured and overdue for CRC screening were recruited. They received colorectal cancer education and no-cost stool-based screening facilitated by promotoras. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a 1-day or 3-day Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit. The promotoras swapped FIT kit distribution roles midway through the study period to mitigate performance bias. Our analysis covered 6,660 FITs-3,067 using the 3-day kit and 3,593 with the 1-day kit. Results indicated a higher return rate for the 1-day FIT kit (61.3% vs. 58.7%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.22, p < 0.001), fewer reminders needed (69.7% vs. 78.1%, aOR = 0.65, p < 0.001), and lower abnormal FIT results (5.3% vs. 8.1%, aOR = 0.61, p < 0.001). Conclusively, the 1-day FIT kit required fewer reminders and significantly improved return rates, suggesting it may be a more effective option for increasing CRC screening completion among hard-to-reach Hispanic populations.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFecesHispanic or LatinoAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccult BloodTime FactorsColorectal cancer screeningFecal tmmunochemical test (FIT)Hispanic populationsQuasi-experimental studyScreening adherenceStool-based testing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.