ArticleEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2025
A nationwide survey on the safety of cricothyrotomy: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan.
Article in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCricothyrotomy is a widely performed potentially life-saving treatment to secure an airway in emergencies. It is also a pneumonia-preventing treatment to secure an expectorant route in patients with difficulty self-expelling sputum; however, its safety and usefulness remain unclear. Thus, we conducted a nationwide survey of cricothyrotomy.
methodsWe retrospectively collected and analyzed cricothyrotomy data from the institutions certified by the Japan Broncho-Esophagological Society or the Japanese Esophageal Society. Ultimately, 116 facilities responded to the survey and the present study included 1001 patients from 26 facilities who underwent cricothyrotomies from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2021.
resultsCricothyrotomy was performed for sputum suctioning after esophagectomy or other surgical procedures in 945 (94.4%) cases and for emergency airway clearance in 48 (4.8%) cases. Complications during puncture were observed in 12 (1.2%) cases. We found significantly fewer complications during puncture for sputum suction (1.0%) compared with emergency airway clearance (4.2%) (p = 0.002), and also at the condition after esophagectomy (0.5%) compared with other surgical procedures (7.8%) (p < 0.001). Complications after puncture were observed in 45 (4.5%) cases, and we found significantly fewer complications after puncture at the condition after esophagectomy (4.2%) compared with other surgical procedures (11.8%) (p = 0.032). There were no significant differences in the type of kit used for complications during and after the puncture.
conclusionsCricothyrotomy for prophylactic sputum suctioning after esophagectomy was safer compared to emergency airway clearance. However, future studies should verify the efficacy of cricothyrotomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39242403What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.