ArticleInternational orthopaedics2024
Management of non-contiguous upper and lower cervical spine fractures.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nonrestrictive Fixation Strategy for Upper Cervical Spine Fractures Associated With Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis: A Case Report.International journal of spine surgery · 2026Article
- Clinical effects and risk factors of transoral Jefferson's fracture reduction and plating in Jefferson's fracture.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Concomitant odontoid and cervicothoracic junction fractures in an elderly patient: A rare case report.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeUpper cervical fracture combined with non-contiguous lower cervical fracture are not uncommon but complicated. In order to outline a management principle for the upper cervical fracture combined with non-contiguous lower cervical fracture and assess its clinical characteristics, we retrospectively analyzed 59 cases of patients who underwent surgical treatment for upper cervical fracture combined with non-contiguous lower cervical fracture.
methods59 patients of upper cervical fracture combined with non-contiguous lower cervical fracture were treated by surgery in our hospital. According to the AO Spine classification for cervical fractures, there were 21 cases of type B atlas fractures, nine cases of type C atlas fractures; 15 cases of type B axis fractures, 14 cases of type C axis fractures; 19 cases of type B lower cervical fractures, 40 cases of type C lower cervical fractures. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, VAS scores, JOA scores, ASIA grades, and radiological evaluation of cervical lordosis and stability were collected and recorded.
resultsOur results showed the segments of upper cervical fracture combined with non-contiguous lower cervical fracture are mainly concentrated in the atlas-axis and C6, C7 levels. There were 43 cases (72.88%) of associated injuries, mainly involving head trauma and thoracic injuries. Four patients underwent anterior approach surgery only, 43 patients underwent posterior approach surgery only, and 12 patients underwent combined anterior and posterior approach surgery in one stage. All patients had regular follow up with an average duration of 67.83 ± 11.25 months (range, 39 to 103 months). The VAS scores and JOA scores at 12 months postoperatively and at final follow-up showed significant improvement compared to preoperative scores (P < 0.05). At the final follow-up, ASIA grades had improved by 0 to 2 levels. The cervical lordosis at the final follow-up (24.71°±7.39°) showed no statistically significant difference compared to preoperative measurements (26.89°±13.32°). Surgical complications occurred in 17 patients. No cases of vertebral artery injury, screw loosening, or other internal fixation failures were found at final follow-up.
conclusionsUpper cervical fracture combined with non-contiguous lower cervical fracture can result in varying extents of cervical spinal cord injury and combined trauma in other parts. Surgical treatment of these injuries can achieve favourable clinical and radiological outcomes in the medium to long term follow-up. More research is still needed to optimize clinical decision-making regarding surgical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39242395What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.