Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39242381›Full record

ReviewResults and problems in cell differentiation2024

Tunneling Nanotubes in the Brain.

Dimitri Budinger, Vivian Baker, Michael T Heneka

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Results and problems in cell differentiation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dimitri BudingerLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-Belval, Luxembourg.
Vivian BakerLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-Belval, Luxembourg.
Michael T HenekaLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-Belval, Luxembourg. michael.heneka@uni.lu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) have emerged as intriguing structures facilitating intercellular communications across diverse cell types, which are integral to several biological processes, as well as participating in various disease progression. This review provides an in-depth analysis of TNTs, elucidating their structural characteristics and functional roles, with a particular focus on their significance within the brain environment and their implications in neurological and neurodegenerative disorders. We explore the interplay between TNTs and neurological diseases, offering potential mechanistic insights into disease progression, while also highlighting their potential as viable therapeutic targets. Additionally, we address the significant challenges associated with studying TNTs, from technical limitations to their investigation in complex biological systems. By addressing some of these challenges, this review aims to pave the way for further exploration into TNTs, establishing them as a central focus in advancing our understanding of neurodegenerative disorders.

Indexed as

BrainCell CommunicationNeurodegenerative DiseasesAnimalsCell Membrane StructuresHumansNanotubesTunneling Nanotubes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.