Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39242379›Full record

ReviewResults and problems in cell differentiation2024

Intercellular Communication Through Microtubular Highways.

Lorél Y Medina, Rita E Serda

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Results and problems in cell differentiation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lorél Y MedinaInternal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Science Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Rita E SerdaInternal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Science Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA. rserda@salud.unm.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) are open-ended, membrane-encased extensions that connect neighboring cells. They have diameters up to 1 μm but are able to expand to convey large cargos. Lengths vary depending on the distance of the cells but have been reported to be capable of extending beyond 300 μm. They have actin cytoskeletons that are essential for their formation, and may or may not have microtubule networks. It is thought that thin TNTs lack microtubules, while thicker TNTs have microtubular highways that use motor proteins to convey materials, including proteins, mitochondria, and nanoparticles between cells. Specifically, the presence of dynein and myosin support trafficking of cargo in both directions. The purpose of these connections is to enable cells to work as a unit or to extend cell life by diluting cytotoxic agents or acquiring biological material needed to survive.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationMicrotubulesNanotubesAnimalsCell Membrane StructuresHumansTunneling NanotubesCancer cellGondolaMacrophageMicrotubulesNanoparticlesScanning electron microscopyTunneling nanotubes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.