Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39242372›Full record

ReviewResults and problems in cell differentiation2024

Organelle Communication with the Nucleus.

Sourabh Sengupta, Daniel L Levy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Results and problems in cell differentiation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sourabh SenguptaDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.
Daniel L LevyDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA. dlevy1@uwyo.edu.

Funding

Wyoming INBRE Phase 4- Equipment Supplement for x-ray diffractometer for Center for Advanced Scientific InstrumentationP20GM103432 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING · PI Nicolas A. Blouin · 2012 to 2026
$56.8M
Mechanisms of nuclear size regulationR35GM134885 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING · PI Daniel Leon Levy · 2020 to 2026
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103432NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM134885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compartmentalization of cellular components is critical to the spatiotemporal and environmental regulation of biochemical activities inside a cell, ensures the proper division of cellular labor and resources, and increases the efficiency of metabolic processes. However, compartmentalization also poses a challenge as organelles often need to communicate across these compartments to complete reaction pathways. These communication signals are often critical aspects of the cellular response to changing environmental conditions. A central signaling hub in the cell, the nucleus communicates with mitochondria, lysosomes, the endoplasmic reticulum, and the Golgi body to ensure optimal organellar and cellular performance. Here we review different mechanisms by which these organelles communicate with the nucleus, focusing on anterograde and retrograde signaling of mitochondria, localization-based signaling of lysosomes, the unfolded protein response of the endoplasmic reticulum, and evidence for nucleus-Golgi signaling. We also include a brief overview of some less well-characterized mechanisms of communication between non-nuclear organelles.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusOrganellesAnimalsEndoplasmic ReticulumGolgi ApparatusHumansLysosomesMitochondriaSignal TransductionEndoplasmic reticulumGolgiInter-organellar communicationLysosomesMitochondriaNucleus

Identifiers

PMID39242372
PMCPMC11409190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.