Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39242212›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2024

Reconstructing Spatiotemporal Trajectories of Visual Object Memories in the Human Brain.

Julia Lifanov-Carr, Benjamin J Griffiths, Juan Linde-Domingo, Catarina S Ferreira, Martin Wilson, Stephen D Mayhew, Ian Charest, Maria Wimber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Categorization is 'baked' into the brain.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. Alpha Oscillations Track the Projection of Reactivated Memories into Conscious Awareness.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julia Lifanov-CarrSchool of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health (CHBH), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom maria.wimber@glasgow.ac.uk jxl1118@alumni.bham.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8769-1865
Benjamin J GriffithsSchool of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health (CHBH), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Juan Linde-DomingoSchool of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health (CHBH), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Catarina S FerreiraSchool of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health (CHBH), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Martin WilsonSchool of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health (CHBH), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Stephen D MayhewInstitute of Health and Neurodevelopment (IHN), School of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, United Kingdom.
Ian CharestDépartement de Psychologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec H2V 2S9, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3939-3003
Maria WimberSchool of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health (CHBH), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom maria.wimber@glasgow.ac.uk jxl1118@alumni.bham.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How the human brain reconstructs, step-by-step, the core elements of past experiences is still unclear. Here, we map the spatiotemporal trajectories along which visual object memories are reconstructed during associative recall. Specifically, we inquire whether retrieval reinstates feature representations in a copy-like but reversed direction with respect to the initial perceptual experience, or alternatively, this reconstruction involves format transformations and regions beyond initial perception. Participants from two cohorts studied new associations between verbs and randomly paired object images, and subsequently recalled the objects when presented with the corresponding verb cue. We first analyze multivariate fMRI patterns to map where in the brain high- and low-level object features can be decoded during perception and retrieval, showing that retrieval is dominated by conceptual features, represented in comparatively late visual and parietal areas. A separately acquired EEG dataset is then used to track the temporal evolution of the reactivated patterns using similarity-based EEG-fMRI fusion. This fusion suggests that memory reconstruction proceeds from anterior frontotemporal to posterior occipital and parietal regions, in line with a conceptual-to-perceptual gradient but only partly following the same trajectories as during perception. Specifically, a linear regression statistically confirms that the sequential activation of ventral visual stream regions is reversed between image perception and retrieval. The fusion analysis also suggests an information relay to frontoparietal areas late during retrieval. Together, the results shed light onto the temporal dynamics of memory recall and the transformations that the information undergoes between the initial experience and its later reconstruction from memory.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingElectroencephalographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMental RecallAdultFemaleHumansMaleMemoryPhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionYoung AdultEEGfeature reconstructionfMRImemory retrievalmultivariate fusion

Identifiers

PMID39242212
PMCPMC11439564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.