Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39242185›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2025

Effect of interface dead space on the time taken to achieve changes in set FiO

Kolbrun Gunnarsdottir, Ben J Stenson, Elizabeth E Foglia, Vishal Kapadia, Thomas Drevhammar, Snorri Donaldsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kolbrun GunnarsdottirDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden kolbrun.gunnarsdottir@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2000-2006
Ben J StensonNeonatal Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK.
Elizabeth E FogliaThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Division of Neonatology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Vishal KapadiaDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Thomas DrevhammarDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4038-2221
Snorri DonaldssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundT-piece is recommended for respiratory support during neonatal stabilisation. Bench studies have shown a delay >30 s in achieving changes in fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO

methodsNeopuff (Fisher and Paykel, Auckland, New Zealand) and rPAP (Inspiration Healthcare, Croydon, UK) were used to ventilate a test lung. DS equivalent to neonatal face masks was added between the T-piece and test lung. Additionally, rPAP was tested with nasal prongs. Time course for change in FiO

resultsIn all experiments, the mean time to reach the primary outcome was significantly shorter for rPAP with prongs compared with Neopuff and rPAP with face mask DS (p<0.001). The largest observed difference occurred when testing a decrease in FiO

conclusionThere was a delay in achieving changes in oxygen delivery at the airway during simulated ventilation attributable to the mask volume. This delay was greatly reduced when using nasal prongs as an interface. This should be examined in clinical trials.

Indexed as

MasksOxygenRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Dead SpaceEquipment DesignHumansInfant, NewbornTidal VolumeTime FactorsOxygenIntensive Care Units, NeonatalNeonatologyResuscitation

Identifiers

PMID39242185
PMCPMC12013551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.