Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39241499›Full record

Observational studyESMO open2024

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer treated with chemotherapy in the United States.

S M Tolaney, K Punie, L A Carey, A W Kurian, I Ntalla, N Sjekloca, A Shah, M K Rehnquist, M Stokes, K Fraeman and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in ESMO open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical and Genomic Factors Associated with Elacestrant Outcomes in ESR1-Mutant Metastatic Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

S M TolaneyBreast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA. Electronic address: Sara_Tolaney@DFCI.HARVARD.EDU.
K PunieGZA Hospitals Sint-Augustinus, Wilrijk, Belgium.
L A CareyUniversity of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, USA.
A W KurianStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
I NtallaGilead Sciences Europe Ltd., Stockley Park, UK.
N SjeklocaGilead Sciences Europe Ltd., Stockley Park, UK.
A ShahGilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, USA.
M K RehnquistGilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, USA.
M StokesEvidera, Bethesda, USA.
K FraemanEvidera, Bethesda, USA.
W VerretGilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, USA.
K JhaveriMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUntil recently, treatment options for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and resistance to endocrine therapy were limited to chemotherapy. This real-world study describes treatment patterns and outcomes in patients treated with chemotherapy in the United States before approval of antibody-drug conjugates. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis retrospective, observational study included adults with HR+/HER2- mBC from the ConcertAI Patient360™ Breast Cancer dataset who initiated their first chemotherapy in the metastatic setting between January 2011 and June 2021. Treatment patterns were described; real-world overall survival, time to next treatment or death, and real-world progression-free survival were evaluated for all eligible patients and patients treated with subsequent chemotherapy. Index dates were the start date of each chemotherapy treatment.

resultsAmong 1545 eligible patients, 76% were white, 12% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, 38% had de novo mBC, and median age was 61 years (range, 52-69 years). Within the index period, capecitabine was used the most as the first chemotherapy agent and decreased in later treatments, while the use of eribulin increased between first and fourth chemotherapies. Median (95% confidence interval) real-world overall survival was 23.3 months (21.3-25.4 months) from start of first chemotherapy, time to next treatment or death was 6.5 months (5.9-7.1 months), and real-world progression-free survival was 6.9 months (6.4-7.6 months); median times from second, third, and fourth chemotherapies decreased with each additional chemotherapy treatment.

conclusionsThis real-world study demonstrates that for patients with HR+/HER2- mBC, chemotherapy provides relatively limited survival benefit which decreases with each additional chemotherapy line, and highlights the need for improved treatment options.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineFemaleFuransHumansKetonesMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPolyether PolyketidesProgression-Free SurvivalReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRetrospective StudiesCapecitabineERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinaseseribulinFuransKetonesPolyether PolyketidesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesteroneantibody–drug conjugateschemotherapyHER2-negativehormone receptor-positivemetastatic breast cancerRWE

Identifiers

PMID39241499
PMCPMC11406087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.