ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2024
Intracerebral delivery of antiseizure medications by microinvasive neural implants.
Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biodegradable Intra-arterial Devices for Focal Drug Delivery to Targeted Organs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Epileptogenic zone-targeting nanoparticle drug delivery system for antiseizure medication.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Focal epilepsy is a difficult disease to treat as two-thirds of patients will not respond to oral anti-seizure medications (ASMs) or have severe off-target effects that lead to drug discontinuation. Current non-pharmaceutical treatment methods (resection or ablation) are underutilized due to the associated morbidities, invasive nature and inaccessibility of seizure foci. Less invasive non-ablative modalities may potentially offer an alternative. Targeting the seizure focus in this way may avoid unassociated critical brain structures to preserve function and alleviate seizure burden. Here we report use of an implantable, miniaturized neural drug delivery system [microinvasive neural implant infusion platform (MINI)] to administer ASMs directly to the seizure focus in a mouse model of temporal lobe epilepsy. We examined the effect local delivery of phenobarbital and valproate had on focal seizures, as well as adverse effects, and compared this to systemic delivery. We show that local delivery of phenobarbital and valproate using our chronic implants significantly reduced focal seizures at all doses given. Furthermore, we show that local delivery of these compounds resulted in no adverse effects to motor function, whereas systemic delivery resulted in significant motor impairment. The results of this study demonstrate the potential of ASM micro dosing to the epileptic focus as a treatment option for people with drug resistant epilepsy. This technology could also be applied to a variety of disease states, enabling a deeper understanding of focal drug delivery in the treatment of neurological disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.