Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39241092›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Backtracking: Improved methods for identifying the source of a deliberate release of Bacillus anthracis from the temporal and spatial distribution of cases.

Joseph Shingleton, David Mustard, Steven Dyke, Hannah Williams, Emma Bennett, Thomas Finnie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joseph ShingletonData, Analytics and Surveillance; UK Health Security Agency; Porton Down, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1628-3231
David MustardData, Analytics and Surveillance; UK Health Security Agency; Porton Down, United Kingdom.
Steven DykeData, Analytics and Surveillance; UK Health Security Agency; Porton Down, United Kingdom.
Hannah WilliamsData, Analytics and Surveillance; UK Health Security Agency; Porton Down, United Kingdom.
Emma BennettData, Analytics and Surveillance; UK Health Security Agency; Porton Down, United Kingdom.
Thomas FinnieData, Analytics and Surveillance; UK Health Security Agency; Porton Down, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5962-4211

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reverse epidemiology is a mathematical modelling tool used to ascertain information about the source of a pathogen, given the spatial and temporal distribution of cases, hospitalisations and deaths. In the context of a deliberately released pathogen, such as Bacillus anthracis (the disease-causing organism of anthrax), this can allow responders to quickly identify the location and timing of the release, as well as other factors such as the strength of the release, and the realized wind speed and direction at release. These estimates can then be used to parameterise a predictive mechanistic model, allowing for estimation of the potential scale of the release, and to optimise the distribution of prophylaxis. In this paper we present two novel approaches to reverse epidemiology, and demonstrate their utility in responding to a simulated deliberate release of B. anthracis in ten locations in the UK and compare these to the standard grid-search approach. The two methods-a modified MCMC and a Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network-are able to identify the source location and timing of the release with significantly better accuracy compared to the grid-search approach. Further, the neural network method is able to do inference on new data significantly quicker than either the grid-search or novel MCMC methods, allowing for rapid deployment in time-sensitive outbreaks.

Indexed as

AnthraxBacillus anthracisComputational BiologyAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansMarkov ChainsNeural Networks, ComputerSpatio-Temporal AnalysisUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID39241092
PMCPMC11419379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.