Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39241084›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

A machine-learning based model for automated recommendation of individualized treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis.

Lennert Verboven, Steven Callens, John Black, Gary Maartens, Kelly E Dooley, Samantha Potgieter, Ruben Cartuyvels, SMARTT team, Kris Laukens, Robin M Warren and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lennert VerbovenTorch Consortium FAMPOP Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5647-5852
Steven CallensDepartment of Internal Medicine & Infectious diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7245-527X
John BlackDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Cape Town and Livingstone Hospital, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7845-4972
Gary MaartensDepartment of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Kelly E DooleyDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Samantha PotgieterDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Ruben CartuyvelsDepartment of Computer Science, KU Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1063-4659
SMARTT team
Kris LaukensDepartment of Computer Science, ADReM Data Lab, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Robin M WarrenDSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, SAMRC Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Annelies Van RieTorch Consortium FAMPOP Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.

Funding

Mentoring Investigators in HIV and Tuberculosis Therapeutics ResearchK24AI150349 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DOOLEY, KELLY E. · 2020 to 2025
$789k
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI150349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRifampicin resistant tuberculosis remains a global health problem with almost half a million new cases annually. In high-income countries patients empirically start a standardized treatment regimen, followed by an individualized regimen guided by drug susceptibility test (DST) results. In most settings, DST information is not available or is limited to isoniazid and fluoroquinolones. Whole genome sequencing could more accurately guide individualized treatment as the full drug resistance profile is obtained with a single test. Whole genome sequencing has not reached its full potential for patient care, in part due to the complexity of translating a resistance profile into the most effective individualized regimen.

methodsWe developed a treatment recommender clinical decision support system (CDSS) and an accompanying web application for user-friendly recommendation of the optimal individualized treatment regimen to a clinician.

resultsFollowing expert stakeholder meetings and literature review, nine drug features and 14 treatment regimen features were identified and quantified. Using machine learning, a model was developed to predict the optimal treatment regimen based on a training set of 3895 treatment regimen-expert feedback pairs. The acceptability of the treatment recommender CDSS was assessed as part of a clinical trial and in a routine care setting. Within the clinical trial setting, all patients received the CDSS recommended treatment. In 8 of 20 cases, the initial recommendation was recomputed because of stock out, clinical contra-indication or toxicity. In routine care setting, physicians rejected the treatment recommendation in 7 out of 15 cases because it deviated from the national TB treatment guidelines. A survey indicated that the treatment recommender CDSS is easy to use and useful in clinical practice but requires digital infrastructure support and training.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that global implementation of the novel treatment recommender CDSS holds the potential to improve treatment outcomes of patients with RR-TB, especially those with 'difficult-to-treat' forms of RR-TB.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsDecision Support Systems, ClinicalMachine LearningRifampinTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantAdultFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycobacterium tuberculosisPrecision MedicineAntitubercular AgentsRifampin

Identifiers

PMID39241084
PMCPMC11379382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.