Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39241082›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Systematic detection and evaluation of cracking behavior of flawed brittle sandstones with AE and 3D-DIC techniques.

Jie Fan, Xing Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jie FanSchool of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China.
Xing ZhuState Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0602-7832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determination of the cracking behavior during crack propagation helps to better understand damage and fracture processes in brittle rocks. The paper studies the cracking behavior of rocks on three scales: macro-deformation (or macro-cracking), internal micro-fracture, and surface crack coalescence. Under uniaxial compression, the cracking behavior of two types of sandstone specimens having single flaws was experimentally and systematically investigated. Acoustic emission (AE) and three-dimensional digital image correlation (3D-DIC) techniques were utilized to continuously monitor the acoustic shock signals generated by micro-fracture events inside the specimen and the specimen surface cracking process. The experimental results show that at the crack initiation stage, many micro-tensile fractures within the rock are initiated and coalesced, and small strain localized zones (SLZs) appear on the specimen surface. In the crack propagation stage, micro-fractures coalesce into macro-fractures that propagate in tensile mode to form surface cracks, which finally break in tension or slide against each other in shear mode. The formation of SLZs is related to the dip angle of pre-existing flaws, which determines the direction and mode of crack propagation. In conclusion, the strong acoustic-optical evidence accompanying different cracking behaviors is discussed in detail. From both acoustic and optical perspectives, it reveals and explains how flaws and material properties affect the strength and cracking mechanisms of brittle rocks. The study aids comprehension of the potential relation between internal micro-fracture and surface cracking in the process of engineering rock mass failure.

Indexed as

AcousticsImaging, Three-DimensionalSandStress, MechanicalTensile StrengthSand

Identifiers

PMID39241082
PMCPMC11379373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.