Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39241041›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Exploring a method for extracting concerns of multiple breast cancer patients in the domain of patient narratives using BERT and its optimization by domain adaptation using masked language modeling.

Satoshi Watabe, Tomomi Watanabe, Shuntaro Yada, Eiji Aramaki, Hiroshi Yajima, Hayato Kizaki, Satoko Hori

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Satoshi WatabeDivision of Drug Informatics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomomi WatanabeDivision of Drug Informatics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan.
Shuntaro YadaNara Institute of Science and Technology, Nara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6209-1054
Eiji AramakiNara Institute of Science and Technology, Nara, Japan.
Hiroshi YajimaMediaid Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Hayato KizakiDivision of Drug Informatics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoko HoriDivision of Drug Informatics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4596-5418

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Narratives posted on the internet by patients contain a vast amount of information about various concerns. This study aimed to extract multiple concerns from interviews with breast cancer patients using the natural language processing (NLP) model bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT). A total of 508 interview transcriptions of breast cancer patients written in Japanese were labeled with five types of concern labels: "treatment," "physical," "psychological," "work/financial," and "family/friends." The labeled texts were used to create a multi-label classifier by fine-tuning a pre-trained BERT model. Prior to fine-tuning, we also created several classifiers with domain adaptation using (1) breast cancer patients' blog articles and (2) breast cancer patients' interview transcriptions. The performance of the classifiers was evaluated in terms of precision through 5-fold cross-validation. The multi-label classifiers with only fine-tuning had precision values of over 0.80 for "physical" and "work/financial" out of the five concerns. On the other hand, precision for "treatment" was low at approximately 0.25. However, for the classifiers using domain adaptation, the precision of this label took a range of 0.40-0.51, with some cases improving by more than 0.2. This study showed combining domain adaptation with a multi-label classifier on target data made it possible to efficiently extract multiple concerns from interviews.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNatural Language ProcessingFemaleHumansNarration

Identifiers

PMID39241041
PMCPMC11379386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.