Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39241003›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Precision meets generalization: Enhancing brain tumor classification via pretrained DenseNet with global average pooling and hyperparameter tuning.

Najam Aziz, Nasru Minallah, Jaroslav Frnda, Madiha Sher, Muhammad Zeeshan, Amara Haroon Durrani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Najam AzizDepartment of Computer Systems Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology(UET), Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-5106-4168
Nasru MinallahDepartment of Computer Systems Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology(UET), Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Jaroslav FrndaDepartment of Quantitative Methods and Economic Informatics, Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communication, University of Zilina, Zilina, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-6065-3087
Madiha SherDepartment of Computer Systems Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology(UET), Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-4084-422X
Muhammad ZeeshanNational Center for Big Data and Cloud Computing (NCBC), University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Amara Haroon DurraniDepartment of Radiology, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumors pose significant global health concerns due to their high mortality rates and limited treatment options. These tumors, arising from abnormal cell growth within the brain, exhibits various sizes and shapes, making their manual detection from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans a subjective and challenging task for healthcare professionals, hence necessitating automated solutions. This study investigates the potential of deep learning, specifically the DenseNet architecture, to automate brain tumor classification, aiming to enhance accuracy and generalizability for clinical applications. We utilized the Figshare brain tumor dataset, comprising 3,064 T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI images from 233 patients with three prevalent tumor types: meningioma, glioma, and pituitary tumor. Four pre-trained deep learning models-ResNet, EfficientNet, MobileNet, and DenseNet-were evaluated using transfer learning from ImageNet. DenseNet achieved the highest test set accuracy of 96%, outperforming ResNet (91%), EfficientNet (91%), and MobileNet (93%). Therefore, we focused on improving the performance of the DenseNet, while considering it as base model. To enhance the generalizability of the base DenseNet model, we implemented a fine-tuning approach with regularization techniques, including data augmentation, dropout, batch normalization, and global average pooling, coupled with hyperparameter optimization. This enhanced DenseNet model achieved an accuracy of 97.1%. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of DenseNet with transfer learning and fine-tuning for brain tumor classification, highlighting its potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and reliability in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMeningiomaPituitary Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID39241003
PMCPMC11379197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.