Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39240995›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Predicting neutralization susceptibility to combination HIV-1 monoclonal broadly neutralizing antibody regimens.

Brian D Williamson, Liana Wu, Yunda Huang, Aaron Hudson, Peter B Gilbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian D WilliamsonBiostatistics Division, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of Amerrica.ORCID 0000-0002-7024-548X
Liana WuVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States of Amerrica.
Yunda HuangVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States of Amerrica.
Aaron HudsonVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States of Amerrica.
Peter B GilbertVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States of Amerrica.

Funding

SDMC: HIV Vaccine Trials NetworkUM1AI068635 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Peter B. Gilbert, Yunda Huang · 2011 to 2026
$385.9M
SeattleStatSummer for Biomedical Data Science Research TrainingR25LM014210 · NLM · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER · PI Jeanne Ting Chowning, MEGAN OTHUS · 2022 to 2026
$666k
NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068635NLM NIH HHS R25 LM014210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combination monoclonal broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) are currently being developed for preventing HIV-1 acquisition. Recent work has focused on predicting in vitro neutralization potency of both individual bnAbs and combination regimens against HIV-1 pseudoviruses using Env sequence features. To predict in vitro combination regimen neutralization potency against a given HIV-1 pseudovirus, previous approaches have applied mathematical models to combine individual-bnAb neutralization and have predicted this combined neutralization value; we call this the combine-then-predict (CP) approach. However, prediction performance for some individual bnAbs has exceeded that for the combination, leading to another possibility: combining the individual-bnAb predicted values and using these to predict combination regimen neutralization; we call this the predict-then-combine (PC) approach. We explore both approaches in both simulated data and data from the Los Alamos National Laboratory's Compile, Neutralize, and Tally NAb Panels repository. The CP approach is superior to the PC approach when the neutralization outcome of interest is binary (e.g., neutralization susceptibility, defined as inhibitory 80% concentration < 1 μg/mL). For continuous outcomes, the CP approach performs nearly as well as the PC approach when the individual-bnAb prediction algorithms have strong performance, and is superior to the PC approach when the individual-bnAb prediction algorithms have poor performance. This knowledge may be used when building prediction models for novel antibody combinations in the absence of in vitro neutralization data for the antibody combination; this, in turn, will aid in the evaluation and down-selection of these antibody combinations into prevention efficacy trials.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV InfectionsHumansNeutralization TestsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingHIV Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID39240995
PMCPMC11379218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.