ArticlePLOS global public health2024
Global consumption patterns of combination hypertension medication: An analysis of pharmaceutical sales data from 2010-2021.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex Differences in Sleep Duration and Quality: Implications for Hypertension Risk.Current hypertension reports · 2026Review
- Effect of chronic angiotensin system inhibitor treatment on cardiovascular adaptations to exercise training in adults with metabolic syndrome.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertension is the most significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality worldwide, affecting 1.3 billion adults. Global disparities in hypertension control are widening with low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) having the fastest growing rates of hypertension and low rates of control. Treatment for hypertension can be challenging, with multiple drug classes and dosing schedules. Combination antihypertensives have been suggested as a solution for their efficacy and potential to improve adherence. Global consumption of combination and non-combination antihypertensives across 75 countries and 2 regions from 2010 to 2021 was estimated using the IQVIA MIDAS database on pharmaceutical sales. Consumption rates were standardized using Standard Units (SUs) and analysed by high-income (HIC), upper-middle income (UMIC), and LMIC income classification. Global median consumption rate of all antihypertensives per 1000 inhabitants per day increased from 184.78 SUs in 2010 to 325.6 SUs in 2021, with HICs consistently having the highest rates. Median consumption rates of combination and non-combination antihypertensives increased across all country income groups but combination drugs were consumed at a lower rate and proportion. LMICs consumed a higher percentage of combination antihypertensives relative to non-combination (45.5%) than UMICs (24.3%) and HICs (24.4%) in 2021. While combination antihypertensives may be preferred for their potential for increased adherence and effectiveness, their global uptake is inconsistent. HICs consume less combination medication relative to non-combination, despite higher overall consumption rates of antihypertensives. LMICs show increasing use of combination medications, indicating a shift towards their use.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.