Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39240964›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Sugar signaling modulates SHOOT MERISTEMLESS expression and meristem function in

Filipa L Lopes, Pau Formosa-Jordan, Alice Malivert, Leonor Margalha, Ana Confraria, Regina Feil, John E Lunn, Henrik Jönsson, Benoît Landrein, Elena Baena-González

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Sugar Transport and Signaling in Shoot Branching.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Filipa L LopesInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras 2780-156, Portugal.
Pau Formosa-JordanSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1LR, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3005-597X
Alice MalivertSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1LR, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0633-4242
Leonor MargalhaInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras 2780-156, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4381-0655
Ana ConfrariaInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras 2780-156, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1685-9712
Regina FeilMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam-Golm 14476, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9936-1337
John E LunnMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam-Golm 14476, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8533-3004
Henrik JönssonSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1LR, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2340-588X
Benoît LandreinSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1LR, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2371-9996
Elena Baena-GonzálezInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras 2780-156, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6598-3579

Funding

EPA Cephalosporin Fund (E P A Cephalosporin Fund) CF392Gatsby Charitable Foundation (GATSBY) GAT3395-PR4B| John Fell Fund, University of Oxford (John Fell OUP Research Fund) 0013575Max Planck Society n/aMEC | Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) 2022.08339.PTDCMEC | Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) Associated Laboratory) PTDC/BIA-FBT/4942/2020 PTDC/BIA-BID/32347/2017 PDMEC | Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) LA/P/0087/2020MEC | Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) PTDC/BIA-BID/32347/2017MEC | Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) PTDC/BIA-FBT/4942/2020MEC | Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) UIDB/04551/2020MEC | Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) UIDP/04551/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In plants, development of all above-ground tissues relies on the shoot apical meristem (SAM) which balances cell proliferation and differentiation to allow life-long growth. To maximize fitness and survival, meristem activity is adjusted to the prevailing conditions through a poorly understood integration of developmental signals with environmental and nutritional information. Here, we show that sugar signals influence SAM function by altering the protein levels of SHOOT MERISTEMLESS (STM), a key regulator of meristem maintenance. STM is less abundant in inflorescence meristems with lower sugar content, resulting from plants being grown or treated under limiting light conditions. Additionally, sucrose but not light is sufficient to sustain STM accumulation in excised inflorescences. Plants overexpressing the α1-subunit of SUCROSE-NON-FERMENTING1-RELATED KINASE 1 (SnRK1) accumulate less STM protein under optimal light conditions, despite higher sugar accumulation in the meristem. Furthermore, SnRK1α1 interacts physically with STM and inhibits its activity in reporter assays, suggesting that SnRK1 represses STM protein function. Contrasting the absence of growth defects in SnRK1α1 overexpressors, silencing

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, PlantMeristemProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSignal TransductionHomeodomain ProteinsLightSucroseSugarsArabidopsis ProteinsAt3g01090 protein, ArabidopsisHomeodomain ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSTM protein, ArabidopsisSucroseSugarsArabidopsis thalianaplant developmentshoot apical meristemsugar signaling

Identifiers

PMID39240964
PMCPMC11406306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.