ArticlePloS one2024
Predictive modeling of lean body mass, appendicular lean mass, and appendicular skeletal muscle mass using machine learning techniques: A comprehensive analysis utilizing NHANES data and the Look AHEAD study.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing the accuracy of bioimpedance-derived appendicular skeletal muscle mass in aged adults through machine learning.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating AUC estimators across complex sampling designs: insights from COVID-19 patient data.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Anthropometric Measurements for Predicting Low Appendicular Lean Mass Index for the Diagnosis of Sarcopenia: A Machine Learning Model.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Hydration Strategies and Body Composition Differences in Male and Female Elite Bodybuilders During Competition.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addresses the pressing need for improved methods to predict lean mass in adults, and in particular lean body mass (LBM), appendicular lean mass (ALM), and appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASMM) for the early detection and management of sarcopenia, a condition characterized by muscle loss and dysfunction. Sarcopenia presents significant health risks, especially in populations with chronic diseases like cancer and the elderly. Current assessment methods, primarily relying on Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans, lack widespread applicability, hindering timely intervention. Leveraging machine learning techniques, this research aimed to develop and validate predictive models using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and the Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) study. The models were trained on anthropometric data, demographic factors, and DXA-derived metrics to accurately estimate LBM, ALM, and ASMM normalized to weight. Results demonstrated consistent performance across various machine learning algorithms, with LassoNet, a non-linear extension of the popular LASSO method, exhibiting superior predictive accuracy. Notably, the integration of bone mineral density measurements into the models had minimal impact on predictive accuracy, suggesting potential alternatives to DXA scans for lean mass assessment in the general population. Despite the robustness of the models, limitations include the absence of outcome measures and cohorts highly vulnerable to muscle mass loss. Nonetheless, these findings hold promise for revolutionizing lean mass assessment paradigms, offering implications for chronic disease management and personalized health interventions. Future research endeavors should focus on validating these models in diverse populations and addressing clinical complexities to enhance prediction accuracy and clinical utility in managing sarcopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.