ArticlePloS one2024
RETRACTED: Evaluation of influencing factors of China university teaching quality based on fuzzy logic and deep learning technology.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retraction: Evaluation of influencing factors of China university teaching quality based on fuzzy logic and deep learning technology.PloS one · 2026Article
- A novel framework for TER allocation using multilayer perceptron and intuitionistic fuzzy Z numbers for talent management.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Revolution in Midwifery Education: How AI and Deep Learning are Transforming Outcome-Based Assessments?Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Review
- Design of performance evaluation method for higher education reform based on adaptive fuzzy algorithm.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2026-06-23Concerns/Issues about Article · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/3E428426EDA32781A1F2891FDC6952
- Retracted
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nowadays, colleges and universities focus on the assessment model for considering educational offers, suitable environments, and circumstances for students' growth, as well as the influence of Teaching Quality (TQ) and the applicability of the skills promoted by teaching to life. Teaching excellence is an important evaluation metric at the university level, but it is challenging to determine it accurately due to its wide range of influencing factors. Fuzzy and Deep Learning (DL) approaches must be could to build an assessment model that can precisely measure the teaching qualities to enhance accuracy. Combining fuzzy logic and DL can provide a powerful approach for assessing the influencing factors of college and university teaching effects by implementing the Sequential Intuitionistic Fuzzy (SIF) assisted Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model proposed. Sequential Intuitionistic Fuzzy (SIF) can be used sets to assess factors that affect teaching quality to enhance teaching methods and raise the standard of education. LSTM model to create a predictive model that can pinpoint the primary factors that influence teaching quality and forecast outcomes in the future using those influencing factors for academic growth. The enhancement of the SIF-LSTM model for assessing the influencing factors of teaching quality is proved by the accuracy of 98.4%, Mean Square Error (MSE) of 0.028%, Tucker Lewis Index (TLI) measure for all influencing factors and entropy measure of non-membership and membership degree correlation of factors related to quality in teaching by various dimensional measures. The effectiveness of the proposed model is validated by implementing data sources with a set of 60+ teachers' and students' open-ended questionnaire surveys from a university.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.