Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39240935›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Assessment of the efficacy of field and laboratory methods for the detection of Tropilaelaps spp.

Maggie C Gill, Bajaree Chuttong, Paul Davies, Dan Etheridge, Lakkhika Panyaraksa, Victoria Tomkies, George Tonge, Giles E Budge

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Frontiers in insect science · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maggie C GillDepartment for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, Horizon House, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0683-8491
Bajaree ChuttongDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Meliponini and Apini Research Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6009-2902
Paul DaviesNational Bee Unit, Animal Plant Health Agency, York Biotech Campus, Sand Hutton, York, United Kingdom.
Dan EtheridgeNational Bee Unit, Animal Plant Health Agency, York Biotech Campus, Sand Hutton, York, United Kingdom.
Lakkhika PanyaraksaDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Meliponini and Apini Research Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Victoria TomkiesFera Science Ltd, York Biotech Campus, Sand Hutton, York, United Kingdom.
George TongeNational Bee Unit, Animal Plant Health Agency, York Biotech Campus, Sand Hutton, York, United Kingdom.
Giles E BudgeSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tropilaelaps spp. are invasive mites that cause severe disease in Apis mellifera colonies. The UK has deployed an elaborate surveillance system that seeks to detect these mites early in any invasion to allow the best opportunity to eradicate any incursion. Effective field and laboratory protocols, capable of reliably detecting low numbers of mites, are key to the success of any intervention. Here we compared the efficacy of established field monitoring using brood removal with an uncapping fork, and brood 'bump' methods with novel methods for Tropilaelaps detection modified from Varroa monitoring schemes. In addition, we monitored the efficacy of the laboratory method for screening for mites in hive debris by floating mites in ethanol. Our results clearly indicated that novel methods such as uncapping infested brood with tweezers, catching mite drop using sticky traps and rolling adult bees in icing sugar were all significantly more likely to detect Tropilaelaps than existing methods such as using an uncapping fork on infested brood, or the brood 'bump' method. Existing laboratory protocols that sieved hive debris and then floated the mite containing layer failed to detect Tropilaelaps mites and new efficacious protocols were developed. Our results demonstrated that the national surveillance protocols for Tropilaelaps mite detection required modification to improve the early detection of this damaging invasive mite.

Indexed as

MitesAnimalsBees

Identifiers

PMID39240935
PMCPMC11379168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.