Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39240870›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Optimized method development and validation for determining donepezil in rat plasma: A liquid-liquid extraction, LC-MS/MS, and design of experiments approach.

Ye Bin Shin, Jin Hwan Kim, Min Kyeong Kwon, Jin Hyuk Myung, Dong Geon Lee, Sung Giu Jin, Myung Joo Kang, Yong Seok Choi

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ye Bin ShinCollege of Pharmacy, Dankook University, Cheonan, Chungnam, South Korea.
Jin Hwan KimCollege of Pharmacy, Dankook University, Cheonan, Chungnam, South Korea.ORCID 0009-0001-2040-1931
Min Kyeong KwonCollege of Pharmacy, Dankook University, Cheonan, Chungnam, South Korea.
Jin Hyuk MyungCollege of Pharmacy, Dankook University, Cheonan, Chungnam, South Korea.
Dong Geon LeeCollege of Pharmacy, Dankook University, Cheonan, Chungnam, South Korea.
Sung Giu JinDepartment of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Dankook University, Cheonan, Chungnam, South Korea.
Myung Joo KangCollege of Pharmacy, Dankook University, Cheonan, Chungnam, South Korea.
Yong Seok ChoiCollege of Pharmacy, Dankook University, Cheonan, Chungnam, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6740-3160

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Donepezil (DPZ), a piperidine-based reversible cholinesterase inhibitor, finds extensive use in treating Alzheimer's disease (AD). Originally designed as an oral formulation, DPZ encounters drawbacks such as a brief duration of action and reduced treatment effectiveness in elderly patients with memory impairment or difficulty swallowing medications. To address these issues and improve patient compliance, researchers are actively exploring alternative DPZ formulations. Consequently, reliable methods are necessary to quantitate DPZ in biological samples for in vivo assessment. Therefore, we propose an efficient, sensitive, wide-dynamic, and cost-effective method for quantitating DPZ in rat plasma. Our method employs liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) followed by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry, enabling in vivo evaluation of novel DPZ formulations. Notably, our method requires only 20 μL of rat plasma and employs icopezil as the internal standard-a cost-effective compound with chemical similarity to DPZ. We meticulously optimized LLE conditions, taking into account factor interactions through design of experiments (DOE). Our rapid and straightforward extraction and purification involved using 500 μL of pure methyl tert-butyl ether to extract DPZ from the sample within five minutes. The dynamic range of the method extends from 0.5 ng/mL to 1,000 ng/mL, demonstrating excellent sensitivity and suitability for pharmacokinetic studies across diverse DPZ formulations. Following the FDA guidelines, we rigorously validated the developed method, evaluating selectivity, linearity (with a coefficient of determination ≥0.9999), accuracy (ranging from 96.0% to 109.6%), precision (≤13.9%), matrix effect (92.2% to 103.8%), recovery (98.5% to 106.8%), the lower limit of quantitation (0.5 ng/mL), and stability. Finally, we effectively employed the validated method for the long-term pharmacokinetic assessment of a DPZ formulation. We expect that this approach will make a substantial contribution to the advancement of new DPZ formulations, ultimately benefiting individuals afflicted by AD.

Indexed as

DonepezilLiquid-Liquid ExtractionPiperidinesTandem Mass SpectrometryAnimalsCholinesterase InhibitorsChromatography, LiquidIndansLiquid Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReproducibility of ResultsCholinesterase InhibitorsDonepezilIndansPiperidines

Identifiers

PMID39240870
PMCPMC11379286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.