Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39240797›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Innovative models for enhanced student adaptability and performance in educational environments.

Lanbo Liu, Lihong Wan

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lanbo LiuTianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin, China.
Lihong WanSchool of Marxism, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0009-0005-3575-3920

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the domain of adaptable educational environments, our study is dedicated to achieving three key objectives: forecasting the adaptability of student learning, predicting and evaluating student performance, and employing aspect-based sentiment analysis for nuanced insights into student feedback. Using a systematic approach, we commence with an extensive data preparation phase to ensure data quality, followed by applying efficient data balancing techniques to mitigate biases. By emphasizing higher education or educational data mining, feature extraction methods are used to uncover significant patterns in the data. The basis of our classification method is the robust WideResNeXT architecture, which has been further improved for maximum efficiency by hyperparameter tweaking using the simple Modified Jaya Optimization Method. The recommended WResNeXt-MJ model has emerged as a formidable contender, demonstrating exceptional performance measurements. The model has an average accuracy of 98%, a low log loss of 0.05%, and an extraordinary precision score of 98.4% across all datasets, demonstrating its efficacy in enhancing predictive capacity and accuracy in flexible learning environments. This work presents a comprehensive helpful approach and a contemporary model suitable for flexible learning environments. WResNeXt-MJ's exceptional performance values underscore its capacity to enhance pupil achievement in global higher education significantly.

Indexed as

StudentsData MiningHumansLearningModels, Educational

Identifiers

PMID39240797
PMCPMC11379186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.