SynthesisDiabetes care2024
Development of a Core Outcome Set for Studies Assessing Interventions for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration.
Synthesis in Diabetes care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Development of a core descriptor set for studies assessing interventions for diabetes-related foot ulceration.Diabetologia · 2026Pooled it
- Topical therapies for diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2026Pooled it
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer Classification Models Using Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Techniques: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Immunomodulatory Tissue-Engineering Strategies for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Management: A Systematic Review.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyPooled it
- Antimicrobial Peptides for Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Infections: Current Evidence and Translational Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Benefits of Multi-Disciplinary Limb Preservation Teams.Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery · 2026Review
- CPB@PLH NPs accelerate wound healing by antibacterial and anti-inflammatory effects.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Management and outcomes of people presenting with new diabetes-related foot infections: a prospective observational study from Australia and New Zealand.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2026Observational
- Patient-Reported Outcomes and Wound-Related Quality of Life in Adults with Diabetic Foot Ulcers Treated with Silicone Superabsorbent Polymer Dressings: Exploratory Results from a Prospective Multicenter Nonrandomized Cohort Study.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Healing Outcomes in Diabetic Foot Ulcers Managed Within a Structured Multidisciplinary Care Model: A Retrospective Study.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
- Hyaluronic acid-based tissue-engineered biomaterials for infected diabetic foot ulcers: mechanisms, evidence, and translational challenges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Effectiveness and safety of Chinese traditional medicine Ulcer Ointment for skin ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- CORE-ALI: protocol for a pan-European mixed-methods study to develop a core outcome set for acute lower limb ischaemia.BMJ open · 2025Article
- A randomized controlled trial of patient navigators for post-hospital discharge diabetic foot ulcer care: the Comprehensive Assistance and Resources for Effective Diabetic Foot Navigation (CARE-D-Foot-Nav) study protocol.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Diabetes-Related Foot Disease in South Asians Living in Western Countries: Burden, Outcomes, and Gaps in the Literature-A Scoping Review Protocol.International wound journal · 2025Article
- Effect of Digital Intervention on Nurses' Knowledge About Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Quasi-Experimental Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Standardizing outcomes in food allergy research: aligning clinical trials with patient priorities.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2025Review
- Effect of Transcutaneous Application of Carbon Dioxide on Wound Healing, Wound Recurrence Rate and Diabetic Polyneuropathy in Patients with Neuropathic, Ischemic and Neuroischemic Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Global Trends in Diabetic Foot Research (2004-2023): A Bibliometric Study Based on the Scopus Database.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Review
- Methodological panorama of clinical trials for diabetic foot ulcers: a scope review of design, implementation and reporting.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDiabetes affects 537 million people globally, with 34% expected to develop foot ulceration in their lifetime. Diabetes-related foot ulceration causes strain on health care systems worldwide, necessitating provision of high-quality evidence to guide their management. Given heterogeneity of reported outcomes, a core outcome set (COS) was developed to standardize outcome measures in studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsThe COS was developed using Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) methodology. A systematic review and patient interviews generated a long list of outcomes that were rated by patients and experts using a nine-point Likert scale (from 1 [not important] to 9 [critical]) in the first round of the Delphi survey. Based on predefined criteria, outcomes without consensus were reprioritized in a second Delphi round. Critical outcomes and those without consensus after two Delphi rounds were discussed in the consensus meeting where the COS was ratified.
resultsThe systematic review and patient interviews generated 103 candidate outcomes. The two consecutive Delphi rounds were completed by 336 and 176 respondents, resulting in an overall second round response rate of 52%. Of 37 outcomes discussed in the consensus meeting (22 critical and 15 without consensus after the second round), 8 formed the COS: wound healing, time to healing, new/recurrent ulceration, infection, major amputation, minor amputation, health-related quality of life, and mortality.
conclusionsThe proposed COS for studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration was developed using COMET methodology. Its adoption by the research community will facilitate assessment of comparative effectiveness of current and evolving interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.