ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
RCPedia: a global resource for studying and exploring retrocopies in diverse species.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Vertebrate Genomes Project Phase I: A global reference genome resource.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The marsupial imprinted gene MLH1 has retrocopies in three marsupial families.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2026Article
- Elevated retrocopy burden and sloth-specific expansions illuminate mammalian genome evolution.BMC biology · 2026Article
- The complete genome of a songbird.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationGene retrocopies arise from the reverse transcription and genomic insertion of processed mRNA transcripts. These elements have significantly contributed to genetic diversity and novelties throughout the evolution of many species. However, the study of retrocopies has been challenging, owing to the absence of comprehensive, complete, and user-friendly databases for diverse species.
resultsHere, we introduce an improved version of RCPedia, an integrative database meticulously designed for the study of retrocopies. RCPedia offers an extensive catalog of retrocopies identified across 44 species, which includes 13 primates, 4 rodents, 6 chiropterans, 12 other mammals, 4 birds, turtles, lizards, frogs, zebrafish, and Drosophila. The database offers the most complete compilation of retrocopies per species, accompanied by detailed genomic annotations, expression data, and links to other data portals. Furthermore, RCPedia features a streamlined representation of data and an efficient querying system, establishing it as an invaluable tool for researchers in the fields of genomics, evolutionary biology, and transposable elements (TEs). In summary, RCPedia aims to enhance the investigation of retrocopies and their pivotal roles in shaping the genomic landscapes of diverse species. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: RCPedia is available at https://www.rcpediadb.org.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.