Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39240580›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2024

Rental Housing Deposits and Health Care Use.

Margae J Knox, Elizabeth A Hernandez, Jennifer Ahern, Daniel M Brown, Hector P Rodriguez, Mark D Fleming, Amanda L Brewster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Margae J KnoxKaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, Oakland.
Elizabeth A HernandezContra Costa Health, Martinez, California.
Jennifer AhernSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.
Daniel M BrownContra Costa County Department of Public Health, Martinez, California.
Hector P RodriguezSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.
Mark D FlemingSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.
Amanda L BrewsterSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Housing deposits and tenancy supports have become new Medicaid benefits in multiple states; however, evidence on impacts from these specific housing interventions is limited. Objective: To evaluate the association of rental housing deposits and health care use among Medicaid beneficiaries receiving social needs case management as part of a Whole-Person Care (Medicaid 1115 waiver) pilot program in California. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study compared changes in health care use among a group of adults who received a housing deposit between October 2018 and December 2021 along with case management vs a matched comparison group who received case management only in Contra Costa County, California, a large county in the San Francisco Bay Area. All participants were enrolled in health and social needs case management based on elevated risk of acute care use. Data analysis took place from March 2023 to June 2024. Exposure: Rental housing deposit funds that covered 1-time moving transition costs. Funds averaged $1750 per recipient. Main Outcomes and Measures: Changes in hospitalizations, emergency department visits, primary care visits, specialty care visits, behavioral health visits, psychiatric emergency services, or detention intakes during the 6 months before vs 6 months after deposit receipt. Changes 12 months before and after deposit receipt were examined as a sensitivity analysis. Results: Of 1690 case management participants, 845 received a housing deposit (362 [42.8%] <40 years old; 422 [49.9%] male) and 845 received case management only (367 [43.4%] <40 years old; 426 [50.4%] male). In adjusted analyses, deposit recipients had no statistically significant differential changes in health care use for any measure compared to participants who received case management alone. Twelve-month sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, compared to case management only, housing deposits with case management were not associated with short-term changes in health care use. There may be other unmeasured health benefits or downstream benefits from greater case management engagement. States considering housing deposits as an expanded Medicaid benefit may need to temper expectations about short-term health care use impacts.

Indexed as

HousingMedicaidAdultCaliforniaCase ManagementCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39240580
PMCPMC11380099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.