Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39240562›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

COVID-19 and Rates of Cancer Diagnosis in the US.

Todd Burus, Feitong Lei, Bin Huang, W Jay Christian, Pamela C Hull, Amanda R Ellis, Svetla Slavova, Thomas C Tucker, Krystle A Lang Kuhs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cancer incidence and mortality trends from 2007 to 2021 in Milan.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2026
    Article
  2. Impacts of a Public Health Emergency on Cancer Testing Rates, Follow-up, and Cancer Diagnosis: An Evaluation of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Strategies for Targeting Mitochondria in the Treatment of Breast Cancer.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Assessment of Rebound in Cancer Diagnoses in California in 2022, by Stage, Sociodemographic Factors, and Rurality.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. COVID-19 and Lung Cancer Interactions: A Literature Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Incidence trends of primary cutaneous B- and T-cell lymphoma before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Todd BurusMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Feitong LeiMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Bin HuangMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
W Jay ChristianDepartment of Epidemiology & Environmental Health, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Pamela C HullMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Amanda R EllisDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Svetla SlavovaDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Thomas C TuckerMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Krystle A Lang KuhsMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington.

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Jennifer F Rogers · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: US cancer diagnoses were substantially lower than expected during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. A national study on the extent to which rates recovered in 2021 has not yet been conducted. Objective: To examine observed vs expected cancer rate trends for January 2020 to December 2021. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional, population-based study of cancer incidence trends used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 22 (SEER-22) Registries Database, which covers 47.9% of the US population. Included individuals were those with an invasive cancer diagnosis reported to registries included in SEER-22 between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2021. Exposures: Age, sex, race and ethnicity, urbanicity, and stage at diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Expected cancer incidence rates were measured for the COVID-19 pandemic years of 2020 and 2021 from prepandemic trends using ensemble forecasting methods. Relative difference between observed and expected cancer incidence rates and numbers of potentially missed cases were measured. Results: The SEER-22 registries reported 1 578 697 cancer cases in 2020 and 2021, including 798 765 among male individuals (50.6%) and 909 654 among persons aged 65 years or older (57.6%). Observed all-sites cancer incidence rates were lower than expected by 9.4% in 2020 (95% prediction interval [PI], 8.5%-10.5%), lower than expected by 2.7% in 2021 (95% PI, 1.4%-3.9%), and lower than expected by 6.0% across both years combined (95% PI, 5.1%-7.1%), resulting in 149 577 potentially undiagnosed cancer cases (95% PI, 126 059-176 970). Of the 4 screening-detected cancers, only female breast cancer showed significant recovery in 2021, exceeding expected rates by 2.5% (95% PI, 0.1%-4.8%), while significant reductions remained for lung cancer (9.1% lower than expected; 95% PI, 6.4%-13.2%) and cervical cancer (4.5% lower than expected; 95% PI, 0.4%-8.0%), particularly for early stage at diagnosis. Rates of all-sites cancer incidence returned to prepandemic trends in 2021 among female individuals, persons aged younger than 65 years, and persons of non-Hispanic Asian and Pacific Islander race and ethnicity. Conclusions and Relevance: This population-based cross-sectional study of US cancer incidence trends found that rates of diagnosis improved in 2021 but continued to be lower than expected, adding to the existing deficit of diagnosed cases from 2020. Particular attention should be directed at strategies to immediately increase cancer screenings to make up lost ground.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsSEER ProgramAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsRegistriesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39240562
PMCPMC11380103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.