Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39240531›Full record

ReviewDrugs2024

Dose Individualisation of Antimicrobials from a Pharmacometric Standpoint: The Current Landscape.

Tim Preijers, Anouk E Muller, Alan Abdulla, Brenda C M de Winter, Birgit C P Koch, Sebastiaan D T Sassen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tim Preijers *Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6953-0358
Anouk E Muller *Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5042-6251
Alan Abdulla *Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2158-6376
Brenda C M de Winter *Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4452-8443
Birgit C P Koch *Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. b.koch@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1202-3643
Sebastiaan D T Sassen *Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4525-638X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful antimicrobial therapy depends on achieving optimal drug concentrations within individual patients. Inter-patient variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) and differences in pathogen susceptibility (reflected in the minimum inhibitory concentration, [MIC]) necessitate personalised approaches. Dose individualisation strategies aim to address this challenge, improving treatment outcomes and minimising the risk of toxicity and antimicrobial resistance. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), with the application of population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models, enables model-informed precision dosing (MIPD). PopPK models mathematically describe drug behaviour across populations and can be combined with patient-specific TDM data to optimise dosing regimens. The integration of machine learning (ML) techniques promises to further enhance dose individualisation by identifying complex patterns within extensive datasets. Implementing these approaches involves challenges, including rigorous model selection and validation to ensure suitability for target populations. Understanding the relationship between drug exposure and clinical outcomes is crucial, as is striking a balance between model complexity and clinical usability. Additionally, regulatory compliance, outcome measurement, and practical considerations for software implementation will be addressed. Emerging technologies, such as real-time biosensors, hold the potential for revolutionising TDM by enabling continuous monitoring, immediate and frequent dose adjustments, and near patient testing. The ongoing integration of TDM, advanced modelling techniques, and ML within the evolving digital health care landscape offers a potential for enhancing antimicrobial therapy. Careful attention to model development, validation, and ethical considerations of the applied techniques is paramount for successfully optimising antimicrobial treatment for the individual patient.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsDrug MonitoringMachine LearningPrecision MedicineAnti-Bacterial AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsModels, BiologicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID39240531
PMCPMC11512831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.