Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39240521›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Isolation and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles to Activate Retina Regeneration.

Hannah M Nelson, Gregory J Konar, James G Patton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannah M NelsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Gregory J KonarDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
James G PattonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. james.g.patton@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

Roles for Supermeres in CRC ProgressionP01CA229123 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Alissa M Weaver · 2020 to 2026
$12.9M
Novel Activators of Regeneration in Muller gliaU01EY027265 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LEVINE, EDWARD M, PATTON, JAMES G. · 2016 to 2018
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA229123NEI NIH HHS U01 EY027265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammals do not possess the ability to spontaneously repair or regenerate damaged retinal tissue. In contrast to teleost fish which are capable of retina regeneration through the action of Müller glia, mammals undergo a process of reactive gliosis and scarring that inhibits replacement of lost neurons. Thus, it is important to discover novel methods for stimulating mammalian Müller glia to dedifferentiate and produce progenitor cells that can replace lost retinal neurons. Inducing an endogenous regenerative pathway mediated by Müller glia would provide an attractive alternative to stem cell injections or gene therapy approaches. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are now recognized to serve as a novel form of cell-cell communication through the transfer of cargo from donor to recipient cells or by the activation of signaling cascades in recipient cells. EVs have been shown to promote proliferation and regeneration raising the possibility that delivery of EVs could be a viable treatment for visual disorders. Here, we provide protocols to isolate EVs for use in retina regeneration experiments.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesRegenerationRetinaAnimalsCell CommunicationCell ProliferationEpendymoglial CellsMiceNerve RegenerationExomeresExosomesExtracellular vesiclesRegenerationSupermeresUltracentrifugationZebrafish

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.