Trial reportSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2024
The effect of supplemental oxygen and continuous positive airway pressure withdrawal on endocan levels.
Trial report in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endothelial glycocalyx perturbation in obstructive sleep apnea is associated with repetitive hypoxemia and immunothrombotic endothelial dysfunction.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEndocan is a biomarker of endothelial dysfunction, which is a precursor to cardiovascular disease. Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is associated with elevated endocan levels but the effects of treatment on endocan levels in OSA are not fully established. We aimed to determine whether endocan levels could be detected by immunoassay and to determine the effect of supplemental oxygen during continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) withdrawal on circulating endocan levels.
methodsWe conducted an exploratory analysis from a randomised controlled crossover study which included participants with OSA. Participants stopped their CPAP therapy and were randomised to receive either supplemental oxygen or sham for 14 nights before crossing over. Supplemental oxygen blocked the rise in blood pressure seen in the sham group. We analysed plasma endocan levels by immunoassay at baseline and after 14 nights of intervention in both groups.
resultsTwenty-five participants were included, with a total of 100 samples. Endocan levels were detectable at all time points in 22 participants (88%), and in 93 (93%) samples. Supplemental oxygen had no effect on endocan levels compared to sham (+ 0.52 ng/ml, 95%CI -0.21 to + 1.25, p = 0.16), and there was no significant difference in endocan levels from baseline to follow-up in either the sham (-0.30 ng/ml, 95%CI -0.89 to + 0.30, p = 0.31) or supplemental oxygen (+ 0.22 ng/ml, 95%CI 0.00 to + 0.44, p = 0.05) arm.
conclusionsWe have shown that endocan levels are detectable before and after CPAP withdrawal. However, we found no effect of supplemental oxygen following CPAP withdrawal on circulating endocan levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION AND DATE: ISRCTN 17,987,510 19/02/2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.